ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3539|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这里为什么省略了动词?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-8-25 07:51:00 | 只看该作者

这里为什么省略了动词?

. A study commissioned by the Department of Agriculture showed that if calves exercise and associated with other calves, they will require less medication and gain weight quicker than do those raised in confinement.
(C)    associate with other calves, they required less medication and will gain weight quicker than do
(D)    associate with other calves, they have required less medication and will gain weight more quickly than do
(E)    associate with other calves, they require less medication and gain weight more quickly than
E选项为什么没有DO。这里动词是可以省略的吗?如果加 DO算错吗?
谢谢了!
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2003-8-25 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
高手出招呀!高手出招呀!
板凳
发表于 2003-8-25 13:19:00 | 只看该作者
我也不是很明白。 不过后来发现不会出现than后有动词和无动词需二选一的情况, 都可以吧。"required" (c) and "have required" (d) use wrong tense ba

还是等高手解释吧
地板
发表于 2003-8-26 14:54:00 | 只看该作者
I'm not supergirl, just for your information.
The comparison objects appear behind the verbs(require less medication, gain weight more quickly). You can incorporate the kind of comparison as one category, such as OG149. In the comparison, you needn't add "do".  
5#
发表于 2003-8-26 15:32:00 | 只看该作者
助动词尽量补出,不是必须补出。e 应该补do,c、d分别应该补did和have
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-8-27 02:28:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢了!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 14:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部