ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1598|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]迷糊了,什么是grammatical referent?什么是logical referent

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-1 15:12:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]迷糊了,什么是grammatical referent?什么是logical referent

29. In three centuries--from 1050 to 1350--several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some tens of thousands of parish churches.


(A)  for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some


(B)  in order that they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some


(C)  so as they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some


(D)  so that there could be built eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and


(E)   such that they could build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and


Choice A is best. The other choices are unidiomatic or unnecessarily wordy, and the pronoun they, which appears in B, C, and E, has no grammatical referent.



我那OG29举例,说B C E的they没有"grammatical referent"我认为有是several million tons of stone ,   但是我认为没有logical referent(因为they如果指代several millin tos of stone,逻辑就不通了),我理解错了吗?

沙发
发表于 2005-8-1 16:00:00 | 只看该作者
但they只可能指代several million tons of stone啊,这样“石头建造教堂”,就存在逻辑错误啊,石头不可能是施动主语。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-1 18:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用三脚猫在2005-8-1 16:00:00的发言:
但they只可能指代several million tons of stone啊,这样“石头建造教堂”,就存在逻辑错误啊,石头不可能是施动主语。



我想知道造成they指代问题是,逻辑指代错误,还是语法指代错误.


请NN回答

地板
发表于 2005-8-1 20:34:00 | 只看该作者

在数量上, 要带several million tos of stone 是用 IT单数, 所以没有grammatical referent是正确的说法, 量辞都要用单数--我做这题时是理解logical flaw, 你提出来我才发现呢, 因该是这个解答吧!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 07:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部