82. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued thattheir clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributingcriminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are notresponsible for their actions. (A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behaviorto some food allergy, (B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed toan allergy to some food, (C) in attributing behavior that is criminal ordelinquent to an allergy to some food, (D) if some food allergy is attributed as the causeof criminal or delinquent behavior, (E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause ofcriminal or delinquent behavior,
我有点不懂gmat的解释说 the modifying phrase(in attributing...)incorrectly describes perpetrators when it should describe Defense attorneys 是什么意思?
所以说but后面的句子是修饰谁的?看到有解释说划线部分是后面perpetrators 句子的前置状语,那这个和官方解释不久矛盾了吗?
英语基础有些差,求教!
|