ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1099|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

足足花了三个小时,请judy大板及各位xdjm指教啊

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-10-15 22:26:00 | 只看该作者

足足花了三个小时,请judy大板及各位xdjm指教啊

A1. “Whether in politics or in business, leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning.”


Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your experience, observations, or reading.



As to leaders of any group either in politics or in business, learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning? The problem seems to arouse controversy between different opinion parties. Some may advocate that the ability to compromise is the most important trait that a leader of any group must possess. Basing on the fact that winning is the ultimate goal of a group, however, the opponents argue that winning can never be overemphasized. Recognizing that a more proper solution to the question can only be achieved by incorporating all relevant aspects, I would like to advocate although both of the two abilities referred above can not be neglected, learning to compromise is more important in many cases.


Firstly, compromising is by no means giving up or conceding endlessly, but rather the necessary sacrifice that groups must make to maximize collective interests.  In this sense, compromising itself is virtually a strategy and tactics of winning that a leader must grasp.           


Secondly, compromising plays a pivotal role in negotiation. Under many circumstances, leaders of various interest groups cannot solely rely on the ability of winning to achieve their goals. Instead, they need to arrive at an agreement through negotiation . It is hard to imagine how leaders who lack this ability but always bear winning in mind can make the agreement. For example, in some industry where exists excess competition, almost all of the companies will have to cut prices at which their products or service sell to maintain or expand their market shares respectively while their businesses are approaching the edge of going bankruptcy. In this situation, if all the leaders just know how to defeat the competitors , the whole industry would continue suffering a great loss due to the sagging price. On the contrary, if the leaders know how to compromise and can come to an agreement to set price limit, the situations all the companies are confronting will be greatly improved.


One argument against my contention may asserts that sometimes compromising will to some extent impair the morale of the members of the organization. Admittedly, it may be the case. However, as I mentioned above, in essence compromising is a tactics of winning. Therefore, through adequate communication with their subordinates, leaders can address this kind of problems.


In sum, I agree that knowing how to win is an important ingredient for a leader of any group. however, it is not always the most important one. In many cases, learning to compromise is more important.


   


开头照搬了snowmountain的作文。


请judy大板及各位xdjm指教啊


还有15天考试,到底该怎么准备issue??


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-15 22:45:07编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-10-15 23:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用joeysue在2005-10-15 22:26:00的发言:

A1. “Whether in politics or in business, leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning.”


Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your experience, observations, or reading.



As to leaders of any group either in politics or in business, learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning?这个好象不是一般疑问句啊? The problem seems to arouse controversy between different opinion parties. Some may advocate that the ability to compromise is the most important trait that a leader of any group must possess. Basing on the fact that winning is the ultimate goal of a group, however, the opponents argue that winning can never be overemphasized. Recognizing that a more proper solution to the question can only be achieved by incorporating all relevant aspects, I would like to advocate although both of the two abilities referred above can not be neglected, learning to compromise is more important in many cases.


Firstly, compromising is by no means giving up or conceding endlessly, but rather the necessary sacrifice that groups must make to maximize collective interests.  In this sense, compromising itself is virtually a strategy and tactics of winning that a leader must grasp.           


Secondly, compromising plays a pivotal role in negotiation. Under many circumstances, leaders of various interest groups cannot solely rely on the ability of winning to achieve their goals. Instead, they need to arrive at an agreement through negotiation . It is hard to imagine how leaders who lack this ability but always bear winning in mind can make the agreement. For example, in some industry where exists excess competition, almost all of the companies will have to cut prices at which their products or service sell to maintain or expand their market shares respectively while their businesses are approaching the edge of going bankruptcy. In this situation, if all the leaders just know how to defeat the competitors , the whole industry would continue suffering a great loss due to the sagging price. On the contrary, if the leaders know how to compromise and can come to an agreement to set price limit, the situations all the companies are confronting will be greatly improved.


One argument against my contention may asserts that sometimes compromising will to some extent impair the morale of the members of the organization. Admittedly, it may be the case. However, as I mentioned above, in essence compromising is a tactics of winning. Therefore, through adequate communication with their subordinates, leaders can address this kind of problems.


In sum, I agree that knowing how to win is an important ingredient for a leader of any group. however, it is not always the most important one. In many cases, learning to compromise is more important.


   


开头照搬了snowmountain的作文。


那是不是考虑结尾的地方也建立自己的模版呢?感觉现在的这个略显单薄呀。而且这篇的布局感觉字数分布要调整一下,第二个理由太长了。


请judy大板及各位xdjm指教啊


不敢当哈,互相切磋而已


还有15天考试,到底该怎么准备issue??


1模版要准备出来


2水平挺好的拉,坚持再写几篇限时的。如果超时的话找找原因看看是打字呢还是思路呢。如果是打字就狂练啊,如果是思路那就拼命看提纲讨论,以黄金80为主


verbal千万别扔啊!要么就得不偿失了。




板凳
发表于 2005-10-15 23:54:00 | 只看该作者
你快考了呵呵就直接看了,要记得标题号呀。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-10-16 14:53:00 | 只看该作者

“verbal千万别扔啊!要么就得不偿失了”


现在正是为平衡时间犯愁,写作文写的天昏地暗的,复习其他的效率明显下降,不过好象写作文对阅读有帮助,阅读文章更加看骨干了。


文章布局是改调整调整,关键是第一点我不知道该如何展开。


我打字速度还可以,问题出在想思路上,你的方法很好,我已经下了你的提纲汇总在看了。


谢谢judy~


btw,很喜欢你的头像

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-12 10:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部