- UID
- 1120925
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-6-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
我看了一下曼哈顿里的几宗罪为:
1. correlation and causation
2. after and because
3. future and past
4. nothing is perfect
5. isn't it ironic
6.skill and will
7. limited sample
8. troubled analogy
9. what it really means
10 extreme and vague words
我又看了一下咱们总结的七宗罪,有些可以吻合上,但是也有很多跟咱总结的对不上(比如SKILL AND WILL)
还有一个问题是,咱们总结的1. 第五宗罪 Either-Or choice
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutuallyexclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, theauthor provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tellsus that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results. 这个 是什么意思,我在曼哈顿里也没看到这个。。。
能举个例子么~
欢迎大家集思广益讨论一下~~
|
|