AA001中profit的写法,请讨论

argument 第一题olympic foods那篇文章，一个错误是从minimal costs 直接推出了 maximal profits.对这个错误我的批驳是：

There is no evidence to indicate that costs are soly responsible for profits. As we all know, profit is also affected by revenue. If the totle revenue of Olympic Foods goes down more than the totle cost, the new level of profits will still be lower than before. Lacking a proper prediction that how the revenue of Olympic Food will be like in the future, minimal costs do not necessary lead to maximime profit.

觉得大概就是这个意思，但是逻辑上不是很理想，请帮我提提意见。也想看看大家都是怎么表述这种错误的。一起讨论一下吧：）

以下是引用dearjane在2005-8-16 11:06:00的发言：

argument 第一题olympic foods那篇文章，一个错误是从minimal costs 直接推出了 maximal profits.对这个错误我的批驳是：

There is no evidence to indicate that costs are soly responsible for profits. As we all know, profit is also affected by revenue. If the totle revenue of Olympic Foods goes down more than the totle cost, the new level of profits will still be lower than before. Lacking a proper prediction that how the revenue of Olympic Food will be like in the future, minimal costs do not necessary lead to maximime profit.

觉得大概就是这个意思，但是逻辑上不是很理想，请帮我提提意见。也想看看大家都是怎么表述这种错误的。一起讨论一下吧：）

象你这么说字数比较多哦。挺好的，你的逻辑没问题啊？我也觉得这个可以算是七宗罪以外的一个比较重要的逻辑错误。

自己修改了一下最后一句

As the author gives no evidence that how the revenue will be like in the future, it is too hasty to conclude that minimal costs lead to maximum profit.

这样好像语法上通顺一点。

谢谢judy～的鼓励