ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

  Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.

If the voters' reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4714

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2116|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LAST 4-1-21政治题一道看不懂

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-21 23:41:00 | 只看该作者

LAST 4-1-21政治题一道看不懂

21. Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.
If the voters’ reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?
(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.
(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame.
(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.
(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.

答案是E,我完全不明白,请大虾执教

沙发
发表于 2006-4-22 09:59:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-22 23:36:00 | 只看该作者

多谢大虾执教:)


But if the party which is involved into scandles will be penalized, then, why "The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election" ?


Looking forward reply. Thank you

地板
发表于 2006-4-30 12:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用小狐狸在2006-4-22 23:36:00的发言:

But if the party which is involved into scandles will be penalized, then, why "The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election" ?


Looking forward reply. Thank you


这个是题干给你的信息,你承认就行啦!至于为什么嘛,呵呵,偶也不知道……

5#
发表于 2006-5-22 21:45:00 | 只看该作者
my understanding is, according to E, the blame and penalty goes to the PARTY, not the INCUMBENTS, whenever possible.  only this option differentiates the two concepts.
6#
发表于 2006-8-6 20:07:00 | 只看该作者
when voters blame a scandal equally on all parties, almost all incumbents win reelection. but when a scandal is blamed on a single party, incumbents from that party tend to lose. E's principle: if party X is responsible for a scandal, voters should try to punish party X by voting out its incumbents, however, if all the parties are responsible, there's not much voters can do-whoever they vote for would be a member of one of the offending parties, so they might as well cote for the incumbents. So E accounts for the contrast in voter reactions.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-7 22:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部