ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1834|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 关于Ving的修饰问题!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-7-6 15:40:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG17 682题
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly’s exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne’s fictional Phileas Fogg.
(A) A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly’s exploits included
(B) The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
(C) Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the
(D) Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly’s exploits are
(E) The pioneer journalist’s exploits of Nellie Bly included


答案是B,我是没有问题的。主要是OG解释里面,关于C的解释它说: The wording of this version is illogical because it makes Nellie Bly the subject of the verb including.??????这里的inclding不应该修饰的是journalist,根据就近修饰名词啊。如果它修饰的是主语,作为伴随动作,他不是应该加个逗号吗????

新人报道!!!!求大牛指导!!!!!感激不尽!!!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-7-6 15:45:11 | 只看该作者
including加了comma也只能修饰名词。这个结构就不用纠结了,实在是错的很离谱的哪种。

OE大概看看就好了,有很多问题。建议还是找instructor的解释来看。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-7-6 15:48:09 | 只看该作者
求回复求回复求回复T.T
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2017-7-6 19:44:05 | 只看该作者
而且这种情况还有,OG 686题
686.Unlike the nests of leaf cuttersand most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider antsmake a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form “curtains” of antsthat hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and thecolony larvae and pupae

A.the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
B.the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
C.leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
D. leafcutters and most other ants in having nests
E.those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests

答案对D的解释是(D) This sentence correctly compares leaf cutters and other ants with raider ants, but the prepositional phrase in having nests suggests that it is raider ants, not leaf cutters and most other ants, that have nests situated underground or in pieces of wood; however, the rest of the sentence indicates that in fact raider ants’ nests are not situated in such locations.
也是Ving不就近修饰,而是修饰主语????为什么???求大牛指导!!!!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2017-7-6 19:48:05 | 只看该作者
fxxxfxxx 发表于 2017-7-6 15:45
including加了comma也只能修饰名词。这个结构就不用纠结了,实在是错的很离谱的哪种。

OE大概看看就好了, ...

啊实在是新人菜鸟一枚,因为看到OG的解释纠结大半天。。。。冒昧再问问instructor是什么??谢谢大神!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 22:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部