ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1554|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

250-216定语从句解惑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-3 01:37:00 | 只看该作者

250-216定语从句解惑

At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.


(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations


(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations


(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating


(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approveA


(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating



哪位NN指教一下



这里的定语从句先行词THAT指代increase,但that前面有wage,是否会有指代歧义的嫌疑? 我记得跳跃指代的原则是要不能产生歧义的基础上,


还是说THAT指代定语从句宾语时有另外的原则? 如果有的话是什么原则



谢谢

沙发
发表于 2005-3-3 06:42:00 | 只看该作者
increase in wages结构中in wages作为increse的修饰成分,所以我们可以把increase是主名词,所以之后的that定从从语法上是可以修饰increase的;至于歧异的问题,关键在于that定从如果修饰wages,那么approve wages从逻辑上无法讲通,所以that从句应该是跨越修饰increase的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-3 21:31:00 | 只看该作者

...很是同意无名的观点.

但问题是有很多题目是明显逻辑上讲不通的修饰ETS确说可能引起歧异,海...还是有点困惑

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 15:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部