ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 976|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全250补充-233, 没有找到讨论历史

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-25 09:35:00 | 只看该作者

大全250补充-233, 没有找到讨论历史

233. According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation’s four-year colleges and universities.


(A) equivalent to the enrollment of


(B) the equivalent of those enrolled in


(C) equal to those who are enrolled in


(D) as many as the enrollment ofE


(E) as many as are enrolled in


想问C错在哪里??谢谢!


另外:


235. Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year sixteen buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.


(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite


(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years


(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years


(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite(D)


(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite


请问D比C好,是因为 被动句式与后面的平行吗?我觉得C很简洁清楚。

沙发
发表于 2005-11-25 16:14:00 | 只看该作者

OG的解释:


1。The phrases equivalent to in A, the equivalent of in B, and equal to in C have too broad a range of meanings to be used precisely here: that is, they can suggest more than merely numerical equality. Also, as quantitative expressions, equivalent and equal often modify nouns referring to uncountable things, as in “an equivalent amount of resistance” or “a volume of water equal to Lake Michigan.” To establish numerical comparability between groups with countable members, the phrase as many as is preferable. Choice D, however, uses this phrase improperly in comparing eight million people to enrollment, not to other people. The comparison in E, the best choice, is logical because people is understood as the subject of are enrolled。


2Choices A, B, and E can be faulted for using should in place of will to indicate future occurrences: should carries the suggestion, especially unwarranted in this context, that the Canadian scientists are describing what ought to happen. The phrase once in every nine years is needlessly wordy in B and C. Also, the language of C implies more than can reasonably be maintained: i.e., that a meteorite will strike one person, and no one else, exactly once during every nine-year period. Choice D is best: the phrasing is concise and free of unintended suggestions, and the use of the indefinite article in a human being is appropriate for describing what is expected to be true only on the average.


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部