ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 710|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-1-4-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-18 18:58:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-1-4-20

20.   Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.


Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?


(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.


(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.


(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.


(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.


(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.


正確答案C, 這個我了, 可是為什麼E不對呢?


我本來想, 會不會是因為沒有tax, 還有可能有別的什麼來pay public employees吧, 可是看看題目, 明明寫著如果取消稅收的話, 他們would find that their incomes have disappeared啊?


請牛牛們賜教....謝謝~!

沙发
发表于 2005-2-19 23:18:00 | 只看该作者
answered just recently. pls search
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 05:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部