ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Providing initial evidence that airport are a larger source of pollution than they were once believed to be, environmentalists in Chicago report that the total amount of pollutant emitted annually by vehicles at O'Hare International Airport is twice as much as that which is being emitted annually by all motor vehicles in the Chicago metropolitan area.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7532|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教Prep08一道题 关于 twice as much as的用法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-5-23 21:54:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
202.(31980-!-item-!-188;#058&006267)(GWD-27-Q7)


Providing initial evidence that airports are a larger source of pollution than they were once believed to be, environmentalists in Chicago report that the total amount of pollutant emitted annually by vehicles at O’Hare International Airport is twice as much as that which is being emitted annually by all motor vehicles in the Chicago
metropolitan area.
A. as much as that which is being emitted annually by all

B. as much annually as is emitted by the

C. as much compared to what is annually emitted by all

D. that emitted annually by all

E. that emitted annually compared to the
这道题选D没问题,我想问的是关于 twice as much as 的用法,之前的prep笔记中提到
If the noun in question is already anexplicitly numerical quantity, then you should useneither"much" nor "many". Instead, you should just use "twice" or "double" by itself.
e.g.,twice the increase--> "increase" is an explicitly numerical quantity
twice as much water--> correct, since "water" is an uncountable noun (but is not an explicitly numerical quantity)

       twice the water...--> incorrect, since water is not a numerical quantity
      twice as much as the increase...--> incorrect; redundant
       twice the increase...--> correct

所以关于这道题的分析中,语法笔记并没有讲A B C中as much as 多余,但我觉得后面比较的内容是amount of pullutant,所以as much as是不应该加的。不知道我的理解有没有问题?求大家拍砖!!


这道题选D没问题,我想问的是关于 twice as much as 的用法,之前的prep笔记中提到
If the noun in question is already anexplicitly numerical quantity, then you should useneither"much" nor "many". Instead, you should just use "twice" or "double" by itself.
e.g.,twice the increase--> "increase" is an explicitly numerical quantity
twice as much water--> correct, since "water" is an uncountable noun (but is not an explicitly numerical quantity)

       twice the water...--> incorrect, since water is not a numerical quantity
      twice as much as the increase...--> incorrect; redundant
       twice the increase...--> correct

所以关于这道题的分析中,语法笔记并没有讲A B C中as much as 多余,但我觉得后面比较的内容是amount of pullutant,所以as much as是不应该加的。不知道我的理解有没有问题?求大家拍砖!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-5-24 11:17:14 | 只看该作者
(1)amount number 不能用many,much修饰,应该是great,large
(2)twice as many /much 是同位语修饰,不能离其修饰的词太远。
这两点都错了~

ps,同大四,错过各种聚会,旅行,照相。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-26 18:11:52 | 只看该作者
恩恩了啦,看语法笔记好多关于比较的总结,有点混乱了,要自己总结下才行。
大四党抱抱!!!
地板
发表于 2014-10-16 11:01:14 | 只看该作者
嗯、你这么想是对的、就相当于把本题的amount of pollutant看成是prep例子中的increase
但是我有时候不知道怎么分辨哪些是a numerical quantity,有没有什么好办法?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 00:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部