- UID
- 611255
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
OG10-19. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet. (A) the protein in rice is higher quality than that in (B) ricehas protein of higher quality than that in (C) the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in (D) rice protein is higher in quality than it is in (E) rice has a protein higher in quality than 答案是B),认为比较对象是protein in rice跟protein in wheat, 而that指代了potein. 这样解释的话,虽然句子平行了,但是我觉得不合逻辑~~ 如果句子是 In addition to having more protein than wheat does, rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet. 那么比较的对象的动作发出者就应该是动词has前的rice, 那么就会被认为,比较的两个protein都是rice has的。。。这样似乎就不对了。我认为,应该是两个主语之间的比较,即rice跟wheat比较,更合理。 而后面解释引用的例子: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be good for cardiac health. 这个句子中 比较wild animals跟livestock两个主语的属性,即含有fat的多少,似乎是跟上面的例子是一个道理。这个是主语的比较没问题,为什么上面的就是potein的比较了呢~?
求解释,求讨论! |
|