- UID
- 854213
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-31
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
关于是否就近指代的问题,引用ron对某个学生回答的原话:
i'm not quite sure what you mean here, but if you are implying that pronouns automatically stand for whichever noun is closest to them, that is very, very wrong.
if the pronoun has multiple possible antecedents, a much more important factor is whether the pronoun is parallel to the intended noun.
for instance, if a pronoun serves as the subject of its clause, and there are two possible antecedents -- one that is the subject of its own clause, and one that is not -- then the pronoun will generally be taken to stand for the former, even if the former is much farther away.
我遇到代词的问题也很头疼,还是尽量找别的split,曼哈顿也说don't apply pronoun ambiguity unless you are backed into a corner.
对于代词我也有一个地方不明白:如果一个代词有ambiguity,但是在读懂原句的基础上,我能看得出来那个代词只能指代某一个东西,但是语法点上它可能会有别的指代对象(也就是说语义上只能指代A,但是语法上可以指代A/B/C),那这个代词算用错了么?OG上答案会把这类归为错误,但是个人觉得语义上能排除ambiguity也没有问题啊,很是纠结 |
|