ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer, so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3958|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12 SC 65 句意解释!求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-29 20:34:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed
building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline
and
act as a buffer,so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.


(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb


问题:这个句子的结构:the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocksthat  

黄色部分到底是嘛意思啊?不懂~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-29 20:52:36 | 只看该作者
本题答案选C  
absorbing 在这里是修饰谁呢? 我的理解是:

SVO,V-ing 结构中  V-ing 有两种用法  1. 修饰主句的主句,与主句谓语动词同时发生,表伴随。
                                                              2. 修饰前面整句话,表结果。
另外, V-ing 结构不能修饰主句的宾语。

所以这个句子中主语是 army corps of engineers, 不可能发出 absorbing的动作。  所以 absorbing 表示 结果,修饰前面整句话。

求证!!!我理解的对不对???
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-1 13:27:50 | 只看该作者
up
地板
发表于 2012-3-1 18:34:58 | 只看该作者
你对这个句子的断句有些问题,应该是:

the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that ____________  

换句话说, parallel to shore是状语表示"where"

A proposed building a breakwater of rocks that ____.
Question: where would the breakwater of rocks be built?
Answer: Parallel to shore.

至于v-ing,你版面搜索"v-ing"吧,已经讨论得很详尽了

65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed
building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline
and
act as a buffer,so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.


(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb


问题:这个句子的结构:the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocksthat  

黄色部分到底是嘛意思啊?不懂~~
-- by 会员 sharon20 (2012/2/29 20:34:17)


5#
发表于 2012-3-2 21:17:38 | 只看该作者
分词前面是主谓宾结构+逗号,优先考虑是作为状语修饰前面的动作,(在时态合适的情况下)表示的是伴随或者是结果。否则作为定语修饰前面的名词

分词前面是主系表结构+逗号,修饰的是分词结构前面的词,作为定语。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-2 21:25:21 | 只看该作者
你对这个句子的断句有些问题,应该是:

the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that ____________  

换句话说, parallel to shore是状语表示"where"

A proposed building a breakwater of rocks that ____.
Question: where would the breakwater of rocks be built?
Answer: Parallel to shore.

至于v-ing,你版面搜索"v-ing"吧,已经讨论得很详尽了

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/3/1 18:34:58)

太感动了~~~baby姐亲自回答我问题~~I am so lucky~
7#
发表于 2013-8-27 15:25:10 | 只看该作者
没有人纠结它主谓一致的问题么。OG里面说a breakwater...acts as...但是答案和句子里用的都是 rise and act,是因为前面有虚拟动词would所以要加动词原形么????那如果没有would的话这个主意a breakwater of rocks的谓语是不是要用单数?????
8#
发表于 2014-4-29 18:42:12 | 只看该作者
iaoinging 发表于 2013-8-27 15:25
没有人纠结它主谓一致的问题么。OG里面说a breakwater...acts as...但是答案和句子里用的都是 rise and act ...

同问啊!!找了好几个帖子了 怎么没人理这个点啊。。。根据曼哈顿和题意 这个主语也应该是a breakwater啊!
9#
发表于 2014-6-17 06:32:28 | 只看该作者
zardl 发表于 2014-4-29 18:42
同问啊!!找了好几个帖子了 怎么没人理这个点啊。。。根据曼哈顿和题意 这个主语也应该是a breakwater啊 ...

a breakwater that would rise....and [would] act as....
that 跳过of rocks修饰breakwater
因为这里的of phrase不表示从属。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 22:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部