ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5781|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请问og139题 and also

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-29 21:54:00 | 只看该作者

请问og139题 and also

是不是一见到and also必错,因为二者意思重复,我似乎在lzm的书上看到这么说。但og的解释中没有提到

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-29 22:00:00 | 只看该作者

and also在B选项中

139. The extraordinary diary of William Lyon Mackenzie King, prime minister of Canada for over twenty years, revealed that this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic guided in both public and private life by omens, messages received at seances, and signs from heaven.

(A)  that this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic guided in both public and

(B)  that this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic and also guided both in public as well as

(C)  this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic and that he was guided in both public and

(D)  this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic and that he was guided in both public as well as

(E)   this most bland and circumspect of men to have been a mystic and that he guided himself both in public as well as

Choice A is best. All of the other choices present errors in coordination or parallelism and also confusingly suggest that King's being a mystic and being guided... by omens... were separate matters. In addition, these choices contain errors in grammar and idiom. Choice B ungrammatically uses and also to link the noun mystic and the past participle guided.(这两个东西是不能并列的) In choices C and D, that is required to introduce the clause x was a mystic if that introduces the second clause, he was guided.... In choice E, to have been a mystic and that he guided... are not parallel. Finally, B, D, and E use the unidiomatic both x as well as y instead of both x and y.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-29 22:13:00 | 只看该作者
lzm 第71页 5-11题的解释中:D(and 和also属于重复)
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-3 20:47:00 | 只看该作者
?
5#
发表于 2004-9-4 10:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用hedayong在2004-8-29 22:00:00的发言:

and also在B选项中


139. The extraordinary diary of William Lyon Mackenzie King, prime minister of Canada for over twenty years, revealed that this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic guided in both public and private life by omens, messages received at seances, and signs from heaven.



(A)  that this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic guided in both public and



(B)  that this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic and also guided both in public as well as



(C)  this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic and that he was guided in both public and



(D)  this most bland and circumspect of men was a mystic and that he was guided in both public as well as



(E)   this most bland and circumspect of men to have been a mystic and that he guided himself both in public as well as



Choice A is best. All of the other choices present errors in coordination or parallelism and also confusingly suggest that King's being a mystic and being guided... by omens... were separate matters. In addition, these choices contain errors in grammar and idiom. Choice B ungrammatically uses and also to link the noun mystic and the past participle guided.(这两个东西是不能并列的) In choices C and D, that is required to introduce the clause x was a mystic if that introduces the second clause, he was guided.... In choice E, to have been a mystic and that he guided... are not parallel. Finally, B, D, and E use the unidiomatic both x as well as y instead of both x and y.




刘振民的书上好像没有这么说吧~


我想也只是also 不是连词的注意点~


B 之所以错,我想第一,并列上的错误,此句中and 应该用来并列两个在 that 之后的分句~


第二,很明显,就是both ——and——的固定用法~

6#
发表于 2006-1-27 18:41:00 | 只看该作者
and also可以用
7#
发表于 2007-7-29 11:48:00 | 只看该作者
我才不用呢
8#
发表于 2010-2-1 05:00:21 | 只看该作者
and also 是不是表示所以
9#
发表于 2012-1-28 14:13:31 | 只看该作者
and also 不一定错,分册上63题有解释到“the two effects,stated in parallel ways,could simply be linked by and also”,不过这里的能用and also是在not only...but also中可以省略not only
10#
发表于 2014-11-27 07:00:19 | 只看该作者
where'd you hear that "and also" is always redundant?
you may not ever have seen "and also" in a correct SC answer, but there are certainly situations in which it is acceptable.
e.g.
I brought the chicken you requested, and also a side order of fried rice.
there's nothing "incorrect" or "redundant" about and also here. the point of using it is clear: it emphasizes the idea that i brought more than what you asked for.

here, they're doing the same sort of thing -- placing extra emphasis on the fact that the cultural preservation has been attributed to two different things.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 00:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部