ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2477|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]关于that和分词修饰的问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-26 10:25:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]关于that和分词修饰的问题

我有三个问题


1.关于that从句修饰的问题困扰了我很久了,我目前的理解是出现 A of B that ... 或者 A for B that 等结构(也就是中心成分A+修饰成分)时,that既可以修饰A也可以修饰B(但似乎多数情况修饰A),但是如果that从句中以A做逻辑成分或者以B做逻辑成分都可以解释的通、单复数也一致的话就会出现歧意,既That的指代出问题了。


但是像og196 d


It is possible that Native Americans originally migrated to the Western Hemisphere over a bridge of land that once existed    between Siberia and Alaska.


这里的that 的指代是不是有问题呢,既可以指land 也可以指bridge,请nn提点一下。


2.另外对于分词也有相似的问题,当前方出现类似于A of B 时,分词是不是也是可以指A也可以指B


有一道princton的模考题


A recently proposed law would accomplish the goal of protecting Florida's manatee population without the loss of revenue from (stipulations of restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries by previously prposed laws).


A.


B.stipulations by previously proposed laws of restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries


C.stipulations for restrictions on the fishing industries and the tourist industry of previously proposed laws


D.restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries that were stipulated by laws proposed previously


E.restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries stipulated by previously proposed laws


答案说d中的that 有歧义可以指industries,应该选E。但是E中的stipulated难道没有歧义,不能理解成修饰industries 吗?


3.关于分词前有逗号隔开的,我的理解是一般表示伴随,他的逻辑主语一般优先为主句的主语。


但是看og179


179. During the early years of European settlement on a continent that was viewed as "wilderness" by the newcomers. Native Americans, intimately knowing the ecology of the land. were a help in the rescuing of many Pilgrims and pioneers from hardship, or even death.


(A)  Native Americans, intimately knowing the ecology of the land, were a help in the rescuing of


(B)  Native Americans knew the ecology and the land intimately and this enabled them to help in the rescue of


(C)  Native Americans, with their intimate knowledge of the ecology of the land, helped to rescue


(D)  having intimate knowledge of the ecology of the land. Native Americans helped the rescue of


(E)   knowing intimately the ecology of the land, Native Americans helped to rescue


Choice A suffers from the wordy and indirect expression were a help in the rescuing of. B creates an awkward, redundant, fused sentence in which the first clause has to be repeated in the vague this of the second clause; further­more, the comma required before and in larger compound sentences is omitted.(这个问题至少讲了3次了) D and E are confusingly worded because they begin with present participles (having and knowing) that appear at first to refer to the immediately preceding noun, newcomers, rather than to Native Ameri­cans. D also has the wordy and unidiomatic helped the rescue of. Clear, direct, and economical, choice C is best.


这里关于DE的解释说分词having, knowing的逻辑主语是newcomers。不理解了


那位nn能帮忙总结一下上述几个语法点阿,不胜感谢!!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-26 11:44:00 | 只看该作者

呜呜,没人理我,自re一篇,nn快来吧

板凳
发表于 2005-1-26 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得A of B that这里的that一般是指代B的。所以这里的that应该是指代land。正确答案是不会把这个that用来指代bridge,因为会有歧义。而A for B that这里的that有可能指代A,也有可能指代B,可以通过that后面的逻辑意思来判断指带对象,给出正确的谓语动词。比如OG上面的题目: Out of America’s fascination with all things antique has grown a market for bygone styles of furniture and fixtures that is bringing  back the chaise lounge, the overstuffed sofa, and the claw-footed bathtub. 这里从逻辑意思上判断market应该是现行词。



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-26 15:00:11编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-1-26 14:49:00 | 只看该作者

2.另外对于分词也有相似的问题,当前方出现类似于A of B 时,分词是不是也是可以指A也可以指B


有一道princton的模考题


A recently proposed law would accomplish the goal of protecting Florida's manatee population without the loss of revenue from (stipulations of restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries by previously prposed laws).


A.


B.stipulations by previously proposed laws of restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries


C.stipulations for restrictions on the fishing industries and the tourist industry of previously proposed laws


D.restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries that were stipulated by laws proposed previously


E.restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries stipulated by previously proposed laws


答案说d中的that 有歧义可以指industries,应该选E。但是E中的stipulated难道没有歧义,不能理解成修饰industries 吗?


昨天作了一个题目(一时找不到),记得也是A+介词+B+过去分词,这里的过去分词修饰的是A,也是正确答案。所以我觉得过去分词应该是可以跳跃修饰的(跳过中心词的修饰成分),关键是看逻辑意思。D中间的that我认为和OG的market for furnitures一样的,可以修饰market,也可能修饰furnitures,关键看逻辑意思。这句话的意思law肯定是stipulate了restrictions,不会有歧义。D错在proposed何previously的位置,这里的proposed相当于形容词,修饰law,previously要放在proposed前面。


欢迎继续讨论!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-26 14:50:40编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-1-26 14:56:00 | 只看该作者

179. During the early years of European settlement on a continent that was viewed as "wilderness" by the newcomers. Native Americans, intimately knowing the ecology of the land. were a help in the rescuing of many Pilgrims and pioneers from hardship, or even death.


(A)  Native Americans, intimately knowing the ecology of the land, were a help in the rescuing of



(B)  Native Americans knew the ecology and the land intimately and this enabled them to help in the rescue of



(C)  Native Americans, with their intimate knowledge of the ecology of the land, helped to rescue



(D)  having intimate knowledge of the ecology of the land. Native Americans helped the rescue of



(E)   knowing intimately the ecology of the land, Native Americans helped to rescue


分词放在句字中间,如果前面有一个分句,后面有一个分句,就会产生修饰前后分句的名词的歧义。这是OG里面多次出现的歧义,有一个词叫做???(不好意思,我忘记了,呵呵)


不是NN,大家一起探讨探讨,一起解决了定语从句和分词的修饰问题!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-26 14:57:52编辑过]
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-26 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

总之,就是先按意思理解,若各方面都说得通,则A of B that 中that 倾向于就近修饰,而A of B + 分词 则倾向于修饰 中心语A,不知是不是这样

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-2 17:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部