ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 23875|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-26-2-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-21 20:57:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-26-2-7

7.     Computers perform actions that are closer to thinking than anything non-human animals do. Nut computers do not have volitional powers, although some non-human animals do.


Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?


(A) Having volitional powers need not involve thinking.


(B) Things that are not animals do not have volitional powers.


(C) Computers possess none of the attribution of living things.


(D) It is necessary to have volitional powers in order to think.A)


(E) Computer will never be able to think as human beings do.



不理解为什么答案是A. argument第一句, computer比动物思想更接近于人. 第二句, Computer没有V power, 虽然有些动物有.



如何可以推出有V power不需要思考啊?

沙发
发表于 2005-1-22 18:13:00 | 只看该作者
It sounds like,  if there must be some necessary connection bewteen thinking and volitional power, then computer cannot transcend non-human animals in performing a thinking-like action since they simply have no volitinal power, thus being void of thinking function.
板凳
发表于 2005-1-23 07:16:00 | 只看该作者

my thread of reasoning is:

(at least some) non-human animals are not capable of "thinking" ( nor even close to "thinking"), but some animals have V powers. so it is safe to say that Having volitional powers need not involve thinking

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-23 17:15:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks Chelsea. I think there is a small gap in the 1st sentence.

Computers perform actions that are closer to thinking than anything non-human animals do.

It seems we need to interpret that some of non-human animals are not capable of "thinking". Can I say this is same logic as a math fomula x < 20, so it is possible for x=0.

5#
发表于 2005-1-24 09:55:00 | 只看该作者

I am sorry i dont' quite understand your point

if i had to put it into a formula, it would be something like non-human animals'action< computers'<thinking

but i dont' think it is a good idea to logicalize the sentense this way.... simply take it as a matter of comprehension.

6#
发表于 2005-1-24 13:51:00 | 只看该作者
Personally, I feel sth wrong with this question. At least it is not an authentic LSAT question.
7#
发表于 2019-8-18 17:56:56 | 只看该作者
lilyzy 发表于 2005-1-21 20:57
7.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Computers perform actions that are closer to thinking than anything non-h ...


C can do B better than all a do B

C ---> ~VP

Some animals ---> VP

VP is not sufficient for doing B

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 01:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部