- UID
- 172813
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2006-8-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
本人女,28, 美本,3年healthcare VC (Bay Area), 2年biotech marketing/strategy经验 (Shanghai and Bay Area, manager level), 毕业后想去management consulting/product management (healthcare or IT), long-term想创业/做VC。Round 1申请了5所,rejected by H/S/W, In@ Kellogg (with $90k) and MIT Sloan (w/o scholarship)
想听听各位真诚的意见应该如何选择。非常感谢!
补充:也申请了Tuck EA, 录取没有奖学金,虽然Tuck也很心仪,但是因为本科学校类似,想去个大点的学校所以准备不去了。如果你被Tuck waitlist了请联系我,也许我可以帮到。
Added on Jan 2, 2014:
My understanding is that the both schools are big on collaboration, are equal in ranking, and have almost equal alumni presence in Bay Area (where my boyfriend is). And I'm trying not cloud my judgement with the undeniably very generous scholarship offered by Kellogg (almost equal to $130k pre-tax income). My own thoughts:
Kellogg:
pros: More well-rounded and esp. strong in general management (which opens door to almost any career options other than maybe finance), larger and more engaged alumni network, looks more fun and stylish..
cons: weaker in finance (given my long-term goal to go back to investment), weaker on the analytical/quantitative side
MIT Sloan:
pros: stronger parent institution (more likely to meet potential business partners from engineering schools, for example), stronger in tech/biotech entrepreneurship, Boston!
cons: weaker in areas outside of tech entrepreneurship...weaker training on soft skills (that's just my initial impression but I could be totally wrong..)
I will visit both schools in February and would really appreciate more of your input in the meantime (esp. if you are a current student/alum of either school). Thanks!!
|
|