ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1057|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

跪求学会计的牛牛帮我回答这些问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-27 17:05:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


坐等答案。。。。多谢各位牛牛。。。急!!!!

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-27 17:17:19 | 只看该作者
来人呀 怎么没人呢
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-27 20:21:44 | 只看该作者
有人知道可行的答案吗
地板
发表于 2013-9-27 23:17:41 | 只看该作者
1) Consider economic reality. Take depreciation as an example. When deciding whether to use straight line, or diminishing balance method or the units of production method, one should consider how the asset is consumed.

2) Fixed cost (e.g the machinery's purchase price, installation cost, etc)+variable cost (e.g. maintenance fee)+ opportunity cost VS profit can be realized from purchasing the machine.

思路大概应该是这样。剩下的LZ自行拓展~~
5#
发表于 2013-11-22 13:41:51 | 只看该作者
4. I suggest we should consider what the firm values most. If the firm emphasize its asset, I might recommend using FIFO,because It will give the firm a better financial statement. If the firm cares about its cash flow, I would recommend using LIFO.
3. I would say it is a good question. I would consider both its future marketing performance and its future cash flow. For the marketing performance,  I would think about how the product it can produce will work in market. I mean its sale forecast, and some other related stuffs. Beyond that, I would consider how much cash flows it will bring to me and what is its present value? Whether it's NPV is positive?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-5 22:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部