关于 n +that be 的啰嗦结构。。求解！在og13的SC的T86 就违反了这个说法呀。。大神看过来~~

花帽子同学 · 发表于 2013-11-13 00:06:18

In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.

A. a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
B. a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
C. a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
D. which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
E. which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

可是在og13的sc部分的T86的B选项就含“a phenomenon that is expained"的结构，可是B选项是正确答案呐。。。好困惑。。。

kiwifoodtown · 发表于 2013-11-13 08:06:44

这是定语从句来修饰名词，而且B选项not just by。。。but also by。。。。平行，所以B选项非常正确。不知道LZ疑惑些什么？

花帽子同学 · 发表于 2013-11-13 22:10:09

kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-11-13 08:06
这是定语从句来修饰名词，而且B选项not just by。。。but also by。。。。平行，所以B选项非常正确。不知道 ...

可是不是说n+that be 是笨拙结构吗？那B选项开头就是这个结构呀。。。

kiwifoodtown · 发表于 2013-11-14 09:08:09

花帽子同学发表于 2013-11-13 22:10
可是不是说n+that be 是笨拙结构吗？那B选项开头就是这个结构呀。。。

n+that be这是定语从句修饰名词的一般结构，谁说是笨拙？重新去学语法基础！

花帽子同学 · 发表于 2013-11-14 22:04:21

kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-11-14 09:08
n+that be这是定语从句修饰名词的一般结构，谁说是笨拙？重新去学语法基础！ ...

额。。。好像XDF的语法老师就是这样告诉我们的。。。额，好吧，我刚刚翻了下笔记，是我记错了> <！！他说的是 n that be adj 是笨拙结构。。。谢谢你的提醒T T

关于 n +that be 的啰嗦结构。。求解！在og13的SC的T86 就违反了这个说法呀。。大神看过来~~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

关于 n +that be 的啰嗦结构 。。求解！在og13的SC的T86 就违反了这个说法呀。。大神看过来~~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

关于 n +that be 的啰嗦结构。。求解！在og13的SC的T86 就违反了这个说法呀。。大神看过来~~