PREP1-60、65 双重所有格问题和状语从句主语问题~~~~~望解答~~~~~~

zhaoshj88 · 发表于 2010-4-13 19:39:04

60. (27763-!-item-!-188;#058&003346)

Mideast immigrants' rates of entrepreneurship exceed virtually every other immigrant group in the increasingly diverse United States economy.

(A) Mideast immigrants' rates of entrepreneurship exceed
(B) Mideast immigrants are exhibiting rates of entrepreneurship exceeding
(C) Immigrants from the Mideast exhibit rates of entrepreneurship exceeding those of
(D) The rates of entrepreneurship in immigrants from the Mideast exceed
(E) The rates of Mideast immigrants' entrepreneurship exceeds those of

我选的E，但是解释里面说有双重所有格，错误~
可是双重所有格不是of sb's，形式么？？这里的rates of 应该是指的entrepreneurship吧？
请牛人解答~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

还有一个问题：

64. (27947-!-item-!-188;#058&003452）

Recently documented examples of neurogenesis, the production of new brain cells, include the

brain growing in mice when placed in a stimulating environment or neurons increasing in canaries that learn new songs

(A) the brain growing in mice when placed in a stimulating environment or neurons increasing in canaries that

(B) mice whose brains grow when they are placed in a stimulating environment or canaries whose neurons increase when they

(C) mice's brains that grow when they are placed in a stimulating environment or canaries' neurons that increase when they

(D) the brain growth in mice when placed in a stimulating environment or the increase in canaries' neurons when they

(E) brain growth in mice that are placed in a stimulating environment or an increase in neurons in canaries that

我选的是D，解释里面说when placed修饰documented examples，导致逻辑错误~为什么呢？我觉得when placed修饰的就是mice，逻辑上也正确~~~~~~~~~

谢谢解答~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

hughlv · 发表于 2010-4-13 19:52:28

感觉是作者看错了，这个应该不算是独立所有格。E选项的错误只是主谓不一致。

slamshady · 发表于 2010-4-13 20:46:49

记得以前上XDF有条笔记。。。如果A无生命，那么"A of B" 优于" B'A"

hughlv · 发表于 2010-4-13 21:30:04

对的，这条我也记得。

zhaoshj88 · 发表于 2010-4-14 00:41:55

感觉是作者看错了，这个应该不算是独立所有格。E选项的错误只是主谓不一致。

-- by 会员 hughlv (2010/4/13 19:52:28)

这样我就稍微放心一点了，呵呵，谢谢~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

篮子里的幸福 · 发表于 2012-10-2 13:03:16

我觉得是作者看错了，当时看到这个解释就觉得奇怪，所以到网上看看大家是否也有这个疑问。明明不是双重所有格啊……

ciciwenwen · 发表于 2014-1-21 19:46:21

第二题是选E,我也选了D。后来看了manhattan的RON的解说：
当应用“when+过去分词”时，会自动默认apply到主语身上。
即：主语的examples 是被 placed in a...的对象，但是这明显不对，只有mice才应该是被placed的，所以，应该用that从句修饰mice。
-------希望有同样疑问的有帮助，虽然过了几年了

kiwifoodtown · 发表于 2014-1-22 10:31:09

ciciwenwen 发表于 2014-1-21 19:46
第二题是选E,我也选了D。后来看了manhattan的RON的解说：
当应用“when+过去分词”时，会自动默认apply到主 ...

RON说的这点是关键，如果选了D，这句就变成了状语从句，那么when placed in 是作状语修饰主句，它的主语就会成为了主句的主语examples，这样的话，句子就变的狗屁不通。所以，很显然，这里的从句需要一个定语从句来修饰mice。所以，这题必须选E。

PREP1-60、65 双重所有格问题和状语从句主语问题~望解答~~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()