ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1022|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]Prep2012-Pack1-SC-026 VSC07631

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-7-1 15:12:23 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.
A. huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport
B. without the benefits of animal transport or the wheel, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya
C. the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
D. there were built, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters by the Maya
E. were the Maya who, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters

答案是C,贴出官方解释:
Architects and stonemasons are people, not things. This introductory element cannot logically modify huge palace and temple clusters. Revising the sentence so that the Maya immediately follows architects and stonemasons not only corrects the error in modification, it also transforms the sentence from the passive voice (were built) to the preferred active voice (built).

根据解释的确C在逻辑上最符合,但是Architects and stonemasons到底做的是什么成分呢?虽然我觉得是同位语,可是工匠,玛雅人...这样的同位语句意说的通吗?虽然说不上有错,这种说法觉得好别扭

大神们指教一下不胜感激。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-7-1 23:57:33 | 只看该作者
不用纠结
就是noun modifier
修饰主语
板凳
发表于 2014-7-2 00:03:22 | 只看该作者
曼哈顿第五版 83页
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-5 21:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部