ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2690|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC资料] 修饰语的问题!求解释~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-16 18:22:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.
  • Apoliticians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend
  • Bpoliticians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended.
  • Cpoliticians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending.
  • Dan ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish was postponed by politicians, who instead proposed a series of smaller steps, intending.
  • Ean ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish has been postponed by politicians, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended.
    为什么是选B 而不是C 啊??

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-9-16 21:19:33 | 只看该作者
首先C里an ambitious plan后面应该是接to而不是for这个就可以杀C了;另外,intending修饰的step主被动不对所以肯定是B对
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-17 13:39:03 | 只看该作者
wym1207 发表于 2013-9-16 21:19
首先C里an ambitious plan后面应该是接to而不是for这个就可以杀C了;另外,intending修饰的step主被动不对 ...

intending 不可以做状语修饰proposed的这个动作么??
地板
发表于 2013-9-17 20:09:30 | 只看该作者
月下依恋33 发表于 2013-9-17 13:39
intending 不可以做状语修饰proposed的这个动作么??

主被动关系不对
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-18 13:18:34 | 只看该作者
miqi20050417 发表于 2013-9-17 17:09
http://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-sc-finally-reaching-a-decision-on-t65003.html

引用上述

谢谢啦  但还是有点想不明白啊。。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-18 13:26:39 | 只看该作者
wym1207 发表于 2013-9-17 20:09
主被动关系不对

什么叫主被动关系不对??您能解释得更清楚点么??谢谢~~~~~~
7#
发表于 2013-9-18 14:10:28 | 只看该作者
月下依恋33 发表于 2013-9-18 13:26
什么叫主被动关系不对??您能解释得更清楚点么??谢谢~~~~~~

就是intend的非谓语动词,也就是现在分词和过去分词在做修饰的时候要看和被修饰的逻辑关系。也就是intend的发出者不是被修饰的steps,所以应该用被动啊
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-18 14:39:38 | 只看该作者
wym1207 发表于 2013-9-18 14:10
就是intend的非谓语动词,也就是现在分词和过去分词在做修饰的时候要看和被修饰的逻辑关系。也就是intend ...

所以应该是steps被想用来。。?
9#
发表于 2013-9-18 15:14:00 | 只看该作者
月下依恋33 发表于 2013-9-18 14:39
所以应该是steps被想用来。。?

个人觉得至少它不是发出者所以就排了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 03:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部