ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2428|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助 prep08 178题 关于这里的require~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-12 11:21:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
我有一点不明白,就是require为什么不作为bossy verb 虚拟。 这是我在manhattan gmat上看到的关于这个问题的讨论,下面这个人跟我想的一模一样,但是后面的人没解释清楚的赶脚,so, 求CDers 显显神通吧!
[size=1.3em][size=1em]Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle - excluder devices be on shrimps nets protect adult sea turtles

A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimps nets protect
B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Dear Stacey/Ron:
According to MG SC Guide, when we use require we are talking about an uncertainty. Require must be followed by one of this constructions: require that xy, require of x to do y, require x to y. However none of this is used in the correct answer.
Analizing the sentence key points: Subject: Local Shrimpers Verb:held Direct object: conferece Adverbial modifier: saying Relative clause: compliance with law Noun Modifier: requiring

Many tks in advance for your magistral explanation.


Hey

I have a question

MSC mentions that the verb "require" is a bossy verb that can use both subjunctives or infinitives. I guess the best answers should be

"Requiring that turtle-excluder be on shrimp nets protects" -> using subjunctives

or

"Requiring turtle-excluder to be on shrimp nets is protecting"-> Using infinitives
i see none of the two in the options.


A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimps nets protect (wrong as the verb should comply with the singular subject "compliance", hence should be protects)
B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting (there is no infinitive , still considered the right answer)
C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect(SUb-verb agreement again)
D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting(subject verb)
E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting( to require is awkward and unidiomatic)


Please point my mistake as this is a GMAT prep question.. I would love to be wrong

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-7-12 19:41:32 | 只看该作者
According to MG SC Guide, when we use require we are talking about an uncertainty. Require must be followed by one of this constructions: require that xy, require of x to do y, require x to y. However none of this is used in the correct answer.
  require作为及物动词肯定首先是可以接一个noun  -----require sth。
requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting 正确选项正是用的最最基本的意思啊! require devices (on ……adv修饰requiring)

MSC mentions that the verb "require" is a bossy verb that can use both subjunctives or infinitives. I guess the best answers should be
"Requiring that turtle-excluder be on shrimp nets protects" -> using subjunctives
我不认为他改句子是best answer。




仅供参考,说的不对,咱们继续讨论哈


板凳
发表于 2013-7-12 19:51:15 | 只看该作者
我找了一个例句供你参考;New law requires carbon monoxide detector in every California home
这里require sth 和requiring sth有什么区别呢?
你现在在回头看看manhattan的总结是不是觉得他们数典而忘祖呢?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-13 14:10:45 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2013-7-12 19:51
我找了一个例句供你参考;New law requires carbon monoxide detector in every California home
这里requi ...

你这么一说我明白了呢~~谢谢喔
5#
发表于 2013-7-13 15:37:43 | 只看该作者
巴布亚monster 发表于 2013-7-13 14:10
你这么一说我明白了呢~~谢谢喔

呵呵,不客气
6#
发表于 2013-8-23 22:26:33 | 只看该作者
巴布亚monster 发表于 2013-7-13 14:10
你这么一说我明白了呢~~谢谢喔

懂什么?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-24 21:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部