ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1416|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] OG 65 分词

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-16 08:25:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
65. Digging in sediments in northern China, evidence has been gathered by scientistssuggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had previously thought.
(A) evidence has been gathered by scientists suggestingthat complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had
(B) evidence gathered by scientists suggests a muchearlier emergence of complex life-forms than had been
(C) scientists have gathered evidence suggesting thatcomplex life-forms emerged much earlier than
(D) scientists have gathered evidence that suggests amuch earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that which was
(E) scientists have gathered evidence which suggests amuch earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that

evidence has been gathered by scientists suggesting that ....
scientists have gathered evidence suggesting that...
OG 上说第一个句子的suggesting可以取evidence或者scientists 为主语 所以造成模糊 不对
第二句的suggesting就只是取scientists做主语


包子不理解为什么第二句就只是取scientists 当suggesting 的主语
请NN解答
><




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-16 08:28:45 | 只看该作者
C是正确答案  忘写了
板凳
发表于 2013-7-16 09:11:29 | 只看该作者
lz,没有看到OG解释的原话,不好评论OG,但我想LZ你可能搞错了。第一句为什么evidence不能作主语,因为前面的Digging,要和主语相一致,而且后面的suggesting 这里修饰了scientists,造成了句意的混淆。

第二句,scientists作主语与Digging一致,而suggesting修饰evidence 是符合逻辑的。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-16 09:44:36 | 只看该作者
kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-7-16 09:11
lz,没有看到OG解释的原话,不好评论OG,但我想LZ你可能搞错了。第一句为什么evidence不能作主语,因为前面 ...

原来是这么理解的噶
谢谢kiwi
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 05:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部