ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Combining enormous physical strength with higher intelligence, the Neanderthals appear as equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path, but their relatively sudden disappearance during the Paleolithic era indicates that an inability to adapt to some environmental change led to their extinction.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1890|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 th ,73

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-6-28 10:25:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Combining enormous physical strength with higher intelligence,the Neanderthals appear as equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path,but theri relatively sudden disappearance during the Paleolithic era indicates that an inability to adapt to some environmental change led to their extinction.

A appear as equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path,
B appear to have been equipped to face any obstacle the environment could put in their path,
C appear as equipped to face any obstacle the environment could put in their paths,
D appeared as equipped to face any obstacle the environment could put in their paths,
E appeared to have been equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path,

关于这道题,我不明白的是,咋么跟时态有关系呢?我一直以为appear to do sth,没想到还有时态的问题啊。另外为啥equip for不如equip to呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-6-28 11:03:26 | 只看该作者
这题OG说的很清楚啊,appear的时态由后半句的indicates决定,but后面的句子时态是一般现在时,句子前后讲述的都是关于Neanderthals的描述,那么主句也应该优先考虑一般现在时。equip to表达了N具备体力和智力,是为了适应各样的环境威胁这一目的。equip for表原因,不表达目的。

虽然原因和目的有时候是重叠的,但是在GMAT中,当且仅当某一个描述仅表达为原因而不是目的时,才会用for,另一种用for的可能就是词组本身的固定搭配。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-28 11:08:50 | 只看该作者

谢啦

谢啦,听你这么一说我感觉清晰了不少。另外那个path 和paths其实是都可以的吧?
地板
发表于 2012-6-28 11:13:07 | 只看该作者
不可以,GMAT中多一个s和少一个s是差不得的。这里如果用path,就是指N这种动物作为一个种群面对的同一路径;如果是paths,就是指他们面对各自的路径,意思完全不同。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-28 11:28:35 | 只看该作者

是这样吗

可是我不这么觉得啊,我觉得paths也可以指它们面临了很多条路,也不全是指各自面对的道路吧。
6#
发表于 2012-6-28 11:37:07 | 只看该作者
嗯,是的。无论是各自的道路还是许多不同的道路,和单数形式的path的意思是不同的。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-28 11:51:42 | 只看该作者

嗯,这点我倒是同意

8#
发表于 2013-6-21 13:46:49 | 只看该作者
jiaoguitar 发表于 2012-6-28 11:37
嗯,是的。无论是各自的道路还是许多不同的道路,和单数形式的path的意思是不同的。 ...

看看ETS对C的解释吧,As equipped does not indicate that Neanderthals appeared this way in the past;
while individual Neanderthals may well have followed different paths, this sentence is about the single evolutionary path taken by Neanderthals as a species.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 00:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部