OG12-36

我也错选d，不过仔细一看，a的确是对。

这个句子主干是DS joined...,was...,and was...

a的句子结构正确，连词用法没有错。

d的问题不在于injured是否要加was，因为我也认为作为状语没问题，这个选项的错误在于后面把过去完成时改成了一般过去式，而且吧become这个表动作的词去掉了。

白勇书里面，遇到这种情况写的是：永远错

1、and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

2、and was discharged in 1783 because she was too ill to serve.

铁甲，我觉得这个2个都对。

1中，在discharged 之前，她变得too ill to serve

2中，她too ill to serve表示一种状态.所以她被discharged,

不晓得我的理解对不对。

我说个个人意见，

1.插入语，一般来说，尽量插在要修饰的部分后面，比如这里的 injured three times

应该放在主语Deborah Sampson的后面，你看the first woman to draw a soldier’s pension，正好

做了插入语修饰Deborah Sampson，而如果injured three times做插入语，那么应该放在人的后面，可是连续两个

插入语，有这种习惯用法吗？

2.根据原文意思，三个动作有个连续性：先在22岁参军，而后受伤，而后因为受伤而离职，所以是三个动词

verb1....verb2....and verb3的用法

3.他离职的原因是受伤，这里明显有个因果关系，所以，不能没有because

4.因为受伤在先，离职在后，用过去完成时很符合原文的意思

不知道这样说你理解了不

d选项中的injured three times 应该算是主句不是插入语，而且要用被动吧。请指教

first of all,

one should "injured" sth even himself or "was injured". "Injure" meaning cause damage "to", so it requires a N.

This is just one critical error with D.

If you are saying, "she was discharged in 1773 because she was ill",  you are saying "she was NOT ill until 1773 and because of that, she was discharged in the same year." This certianlly did distort the meaning of original sentence, which uses "become" to describe a before-after status.