LSAT-0212-4-19【will】

pocahontas · 发表于 2004-9-23 23:59:00

[attachimg]20377[/attachimg]

key's D.我觉得a也可以，我想为什么文中说this can easily be seen from the fact that...，正是因为和这个引用的有关嘛。将a取非，不是所有的人都不愿意自己的财产给不认识的人，削弱了人名应该立遗嘱的这个结论。

cranberry · 发表于 2004-9-24 00:26:00

其实a说得和d的意思基本接近，但a的错误在绝对。

lawyer_1 · 发表于 2004-9-24 00:36:00

原文只是认为远房亲戚比朋友有更大的权利不好，没有说不给远房亲戚。所以A的假设太过，EXAGARATED ERROR。

dphxmg · 发表于 2008-10-15 17:51:00

"将a取非，不是所有的人都不愿意自己的财产给不认识的人，削弱了人名应该立遗嘱的这个结论。"
This is wrong. If we negative a, we get "Someone wants her or his estate to go to someone he or she has never met."

The conclusion of the argument is "People should has a will and this will should state how he or she wishes to distribute his or her estate." What if people don't care the distribution of their estate at all? If I love my friends, why should I give them something pecuniary not something spiritual? Good friends hang out everyday and have fun. That is enough. Isn't the good memory of those old days valuable? Is money the standard for measuring relationship between people? It may be but not the only one.

So D addresses the questions above-mentioned. People generally care about money.

sevfye · 发表于 2008-11-28 05:10:00

将a 取非即有些人愿意把财产给不认识的人. 并不能削弱 "one ought to have a will"

The conclusion only cares about "ought to have " or not. it does not mean one should give the estate to beloved friends.

If we deny D,which is people are indifferent,then,one does not have to have a will,since there is no difference to him between the beloved and the never met.

LSAT-0212-4-19【will】

LSAT-0212-4-19【will】

本帖子中包含更多资源

LSAT-0212-4-19【will】

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()