5.11二战，第一次发帖，望狠狠地批斗

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-16 14:44:21

Diversified attitudes exist among people as to whether the university should spend money in supporting social activities or improving daily meals for students. Some argue that the university should focus more on the students’ healthy diet. My view, however, is that there are so many benefits come with being involved in financial supporting for social activities that the university should invest money in them rather than meal improving.
Concerning career preparation, it is more advisable to invest much capital in the extracurricular activities. It is widely believed that career preparation is probably the primary reason that people attend college. When the university gives the economic supporting to the social activities, the organizations could carry out crowds of helpful activities for the students. For instance, some prestigious schools often goes to the expense of inviting successful celebrities to give speeches to motivate and inspire students to help their apprentices get courage and confidence; also, some colleges pay occupation planners to provide lots of strategies in writing resume and tips in surviving from interview for the candidates. If the school retrenches money supply for the social activities, many such activities cannot be carried out well. So the college should spend money on association activities because it is good for students’ career preparation.
When it comes to entering society, the university is more sensible to spend money in strengthen social activities. Nowadays, the need of versatile genius for society is on the rise. Therefore, the students should obtain a large number of social skills before they enter society. Taking part in clubs or organizations, students will develop many effective social skills, such as communication, organization, leadership and teamwork, which further result in good prospects of occupation and life. University should offer more relative activities for students to learn about them, and spending more money will develop these events well. Take my college for example, it often give financial supporting to the social activities to launch a large and significant projects and programs. Doing these tasks, our students gain the ability to communicate our own ideas clearly and the skill to cooperate with other members. Thus, the university should support the public activities for the students’ preparation to enter society.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that the students’ diets are essential, and the university should spend much on it. However, students have enough sufficient pocket money from parents to sustain their life and pay for their food today. Consequently, there is no need to spend excessive money in the students’ meals.
In sum, the principal goal of university is to bring students into adulthood with all of the skills and abilities they need to function effectively in work and society. Giving the financial supporting to the activities could provide such capacities for the students to help them stand out in the serious competition. Hence, the university should invest money in social activities rather than meal improving.

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-16 14:45:11

忘了写题目：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 学校应该出钱支持social activities还是改善学生伙食？

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-16 17:07:55

每天一篇没问题 2012.09.15 NA
School always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful? 1、to evaluate teachers' performance by students. 2、to evaluate teachers' performance by teachers?
Outline：观点—交给学生评判
      论点1—老师教学的对象是学生，感受更直观，例如体现在成绩
      论点2—可以比较不同老师的教学，更全面
      驳斥—老师和老师之间存在竞争，不客观
      结论
Nowadays, the progression of society and the development of economy have promoted the spread of education. Hence, the teachers play a vital role in the lives of many people. Such a question will pose in front of many schools: Which way is more effective to evaluate teachers’ performance, by students or other teachers? It is held by some people that school should estimate teachers’ work by their fellow colleagues. But the overwhelming people, including me, would find that it is more direct, more comprehensive and more impartial to appraise the teachers’ performance by their students.
When it comes to estimating task performance of teachers, their students always have the most direct feeling. It is universally acknowledged that students are the objects of education that teachers perform for. If a teacher does well in class, students simply will show great interests over this subject and concentrate themselves on his or her class. Moreover, the students will do well in this course and earn good marks. That is an indirect index of a teacher's teaching achievement and vice versa. A case in point is me. When I was in high school, I experienced an excellent biology teacher. His vivid teaching made me had a strong interest in biology at that time, which further resulted my high grades in this subject in the final exam. On the contrary, if a teacher’s class is monotonous, the students will be sick of his or her course. What is more, some students may skip class, the students’ marks will not good certainly. Thus, it is sensible to choose the students as the object to evaluate the teachers’ performance because they are the direct ones that teachers perform for, and their score is the direct proofs of the teachers’ good job.
Concerning the comprehensive assessment of the teachers, students are also the optimal respondents. It is widely believed that students have to receive various courses in the school, such as English, mathematics, art, music and so on. Students can come into contact with varied teachers, and there are more opportunities for them to experience different professors' unique means of imparting knowledge and information. Therefore, they can make a comparison between different teaching methods of their teachers. Take my cousin for an example. He is a middle school student now, and he learns about 8 or 9 kinds of curriculum one semester. In other words, he has experienced 8 to 9 teachers’ classes at least. He often tells me that one teacher is better than another one in some respects like teaching method, assignment designing, kindness and patience. This live example has proved that students’ appraisement of their teachers is ideal and comprehensive through comparing with other teachers.
Admittedly, may be a counterpart like a teacher’s colleague could evaluate him or her from a more professional point. After all, there is a peer competition among the teachers, which results in subjective and prejudice judgment easily. But this phenomenon does not exist between the students and teacher.
All in all, it is more direct, more comprehensive and low inequitable to evaluate teachers' performance by their students than by other teachers. Consequently, students’ assessment of their teachers is very reasonable.

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-17 16:59:52

每天1篇没问题，2012.10.6 NA
Nowadays, neighbors depend on each other less than the people in the past.
Outline：观点—同意，现在的人更少依赖于邻居
      论点1—邻里之间陌生了：住房结构改变，忙碌而接触的少
      论点2—对隐私的保护，不愿过多谈论及帮忙
      结论
According to a recent survey conducted by CCTV in Beijing, China, over thirty percent of people are hardly acquainted with their neighbors; sixty-five percent of residents think they are live in an indifferent neighborhood with one another; and a fair proportion of them would not turn to their neighbors for help when they encounter with emergence. From my opinion of view, people are more alienated from their neighbors and less depended on each other than the people in the past.
Concerning strange relationship among neighbors, it is more acceptable that neighbors depend on each other less than the people in the past. For one thing, our housing structure has changed compared with the past. With the development of economy, an increasing number of high buildings and large mansions can be found everywhere in the city. A majority of people live in the storied houses or apartment buildings today. For instance, in the residential community which I live in, nearly all the habitants install the anti-theft window and security door. And every household with its door inhospitably bolted, which results in separation of the neighbors. However, once I heard from my mother that when she was a child, people always lived in tube-shaped apartments or cottages. And she often dropped by her neighbor’s home to have a meal if her parents were too busy to look after her. You see, in the past, people were more dependent on neighbors than people today. For another thing, people are so busy that they have no time to get in touch with neighbors, especially office workers. They are busy with the work, study and social activities, even they don’t even have time to say hello to their neighbors. Relative speaking, in the past, people had more spare time to communicate with neighbors. For example, they often played chess, strolled and chatted together at that time. Therefore, neighbors depend on each other less than the people in the past because modern life has made them strange.
Moreover, to protect privacy, contemporary people are more independent than past people. As social and interpersonal relationship becomes complicated, people pay more attention to privacy and security. They believed that the less private affairs be known by others, the more secure they are. Thus, they don’t want their neighbors to know their personal problems and they are unwilling to mind others’ business. As a case in point, once my uncle brought an expensive wardrobe, it was too heavy to carry that he wanted to turn to his neighbor for help. After a moment thinking, then he resisted that idea. Because he didn't want to let others know that he brought the valuables, and he was reluctant to let someone others into his room. He thought that was a kind of invasion of privacy. On the contrary, when he was a teenager, my grandparents purchased the first electrical equipment—a television, they turned to almost all their neighbors for help to carry it and asked them to go to home to watch TV program. Hence, like lock up their heart, contemporary habitants depend on each other less than the people in the past.
In a nutshell, taking all these factors into account, I should reinforce my statement that I simply agree with the point that: nowadays, neighbors depend on each other less than people in the past.

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-19 14:24:42

2012.10.12 NA
Do you agree or disagree this statement: the rules that the whole societies today expect to young people to follow obey are too strict.
Outline：观点—不同意，要求年轻人遵守的社会规则并不过分严苛
      论点1—已进入民主自由的社会，社会对年轻人更加宽容（思想上,行为上）
      论点2—经济发展，对年轻人政策放宽
      让步—有所要求，但也是为了保障一个好的社会环境
      总结
“No rules no standards” is a cliché. This society has set various boundaries and rules throughout history, and nowadays, an increasing number of young people complain that those rules are too strict. As for whether the standards that the whole societies today expect to young people to follow obey are excessive rigorous, my opinion and reasoning are like this: they do not, and I insist that: they should.
Concerning the thought and behavior of the youngsters, it is more reasonable to think that social norms are not excessive strict to young people. It is widely believed that our society has entered into a fair free and democratic phase at present, especially in the aspect of liberation of minds. In other words, young people can express their own ideal and do what they want to do more freely than people in the past. As a case in point, in my university, school authority established the principal mail to give college students the opportunity to convey their ideas or offer proposals. I remember that once the meals of our refectory tested very, very bad. Our students sent an email to the principal to ask for improving our diet, and quickly, the school responded and solved this problem. I told this matter to my father. Then he said that it was impossible in their era. Moreover, in the side of dressing, our society rules are also lenient for young people. You can see young people dress up all kinds of fashion clothes in the street. Young girls can dress mini-skirt. You know in the old society, people had to wear the clothes with dark color. So, the society allows the young people to deliver their opinion, including their dissatisfaction with the authority, and do something they cannot do in the past day. It is undeniable that our society gives us more free rather than strict rules.
When it comes to the policy for young people, people also cannot say the rules that the whole societies today are too strict. With continuous improvement of economy, our society implements policies more flexibly today than in the past. It can be easily observed that production and purchase were all restricted in the planned economy era, people cannot do a lot of things, such as do business, go abroad, even the girls cannot go to the university. But nowadays, a loose-policy is offered to young people. No example is more typical than the relaxation of the one-child policy, one of our national policies previously, which has been displaced by another kind of policy that means young couple can have two children. But in the past, one couple could only give birth to one child. This live example has proved that the rules that the whole societies today expect to young people to follow obey are not too strict.
Yet, admitting that social criterion is not excessive strict does not necessary mean that our society rule is not strict. Normally, the rules of society still expect much on young people to follow obey, because only an orderly society could provide a happiness life to people.
Therefore, I firmly believe that the norms that the society today expect to young people to follow obey are not too strict. And the strict regulations for the youth are not even a little excessive.

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-19 17:06:02

米天一篇米问题

2012.11.3NA
Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children’s future for them.
Outline：观点—由孩子自己做决定更好
      论点1—培养独立思考的能力，有力将来于解决问题
      论点2—有主见，有利于走向社会，取得成功
      总结—同意，且父母可以正确引导
Such a question will often pose in front of us: which is the better way to make choices, by children themselves or by their parents? It is undeniable that many parents will cast their preference to determining their children’s future for them. But the overwhelming majority of people, including me, would find that determining by children themselves independently paves the way for solving problems and entering society and finally grabbing success.
When it comes to fostering the capacity of independent thinking, I simply believe that parents should allow their children to make their own choices. It can be easily observed that children often have to confront multifarious difficult problems in their lives. When they encounter such a dilemma, how would they solve it? Yes, they can appeal to their parents or relatives even their friends for aid of course, but they must face up to challenge alone. So, they should have the ability to settle the problems, and it is no doubt that allowing the children to make their own decisions is conducive to promote this capability. A case in point is Steve Jobs, the most famous IT geniuses and ex-CEO of Apple Inc. He re-took over the Apple cooperation when the company experienced the bottleneck in 1997. While the other decision makers gave up trying, he insistently adopted the strategies of innovation and reformation, which further resulted in another prosperous period of Apple. Once he said, “Making decisions by myself from childhood is extremely crucial to thinking independently. And just this ability brought about my achievements” in a speech. So parents should let the children to make their own choice to develop their capacity of independent thinking for solving problem which they may face to in their lives.
Moreover, in the long term, to become strong-minded, children should determine their future depend themselves. It is widely believed that there are quite a few children are so rely on parents excessively that they can hardly determine when they facing the various choices. However, children have to encounter a large number of such those options. If they depend on their parents to make the decisions, large and small, all the time, they will easily loss their way, especially in the watershed of their lives. Thus, parents should let the children to determine their own future to train the strong-minded ability, which could further help them make an optimal decision at the crucial moment of their lives. No example is more typical than Bill Gates, one of the richest IT giants over the world, who gave up the medical studies and insisted on his own choice and finally became fairly successful. So I firmly insist that parents should offer the place to their children to make the choices alone rather than take the place of them.
All in all, Parents should allow children to make their own choices, because it is instrumental to their capacity of independent thinking and definite view. Additionally, teenagers are in their formative ages and are emotionally vulnerable. So they need their parents’ help when they make choices. So, it should better give some advice and guidance to the children instead of making decisions for them.

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-21 00:03:53

2012.11.3NA
父母应该多陪孩子玩游戏或体育运动还是陪孩子做和学校学习有关的事情。
Outline：观点—体育和游戏，同样可以促进孩子的学习
      论点1—体育，锻炼身体，帮助学习
      论点2—游戏，开发智力，提高能力
      总结
Nowadays, an increasing number of parents spend a great quantity of effort in fostering their children. Sometimes, however, expecting too much of children and spending much time to accompany them on study, parents put a lot of pressure on the children, which may block the path for their learning. From my opinion of view, I note that parents have the responsibility to emphasize on the sports and games instead of burying their children in the homework.
When it comes to health of children, it is more advisable to take time to accompany them on doing exercise. It is widely believed that physical condition is the prerequisite to maintain the normal function of all other activities. Given the fierce competition of modern society, students nowadays are suffering from the huge pressure. This kind of mental pressure may transform into a physical disease that finally impacts on the daily life of children. Meanwhile, students are almost fully occupied by the academic burden in school and have no spare time to exercise their body. Hence, parents should deliberately carry out some sport activities to help their children keeping health. According to a recent survey conducted in Shanghai, China, researchers divided the 80 students into two groups. The students in the first group took exercise about 40 minutes after school while the students in the second group had no exercise. After 2 months, the first group students got the higher grades in the final-exam than the second group ones, and some students in the first group said that they were full of vigor when they were studying. This study has showed that a strong body by doing exercise ensures the energy spent on study, so parents make a routine to do exercise with their children.
Moreover, playing games is conducive to the development of intelligence, which further paves the way for studying. As is known to us all, the book only teaches students the abstract and conceptive knowledge while the test and exam for students in school is tightly related to merely the promotion in intelligence and divergent thinking. However, in the process of playing games with their parents, children can learn and develop a lot, such as imagination, creation, emulation and so on. Some experts have proposed to take the advantage of the game to train the children’s skills of problem solution, including comprehending the problem and finding the effective ways. Experts also pointed out: playing games with their parents can improve such this kind of ability more remarkable. For example, children can watch and learn the ability of working with a team in a basketball battle that involves the parents and other people. Thus, playing with parents can learn a lot that hardly could be cultivated within class.
All in all, it is more sensible that parents should be with their children exercising and playing, because it is instrumental to a strong body and high IQ.

月月鸟man · 发表于 2013-4-22 16:39:23

Nowadays, an increasing number of high technology products come into our life, and they play vital roles in all aspects around as. Whether these technological achievements simplify our lives or complicate matters, from my opinion of view, high technology does make our life simpler rather than result in complication.
First, technology is conducive to people’s communication. A booming group of high technology products make our communication more and more easily. Using the technological tools, people do not have to be restricted by distance and become much closer. For example, the signal of a communication satellite could cover about 40% surface of the Earth. In everywhere covered by signal, no matter on the ground or on the sea or in the sky, our human can intercommunicate. And up to now, we have achieved global communications, including the polar region. You can imagine that we can simply get in touch with someone at a distance of hundreds or even thousands of miles. How wonderful it is? On the other hand, the development of Internet brings a lot of social networks into our lives, such as Facebook, Twitter and MSN. Through those social networks, we can make new friends easily even though we are not in the same city or country. And thanks to these communication tools, we could keep close contact with our friends conveniently without face to face. So, look, these are the benefits which technology brings about, they simplify our communication.
Second, another positive effect technology have on people’s lives is that it is convenient for us to know the current events. Today, we are living in an Information Age. More and more people, especially the modern youths, concern themselves about the current affairs and they do not want to shut away from the outside world. The technology products like television, broadcast and Internet can make us acquire the news easily and timely. For instance, we often see the 24-hour real-time tracking information around the world in the television which makes us well-informed; and surfing in the Internet, we can know the events which are happening in the world so simply that we just need click the mouse in a second; the car radio, by using it, we can get news when we on the way to office. Clearly, technology is making us much omniscient.
Additionally, technology contribute to our convenient and simply life. When it comes to our daily life, we should admit that the emergence of technology products make many things come to easier. A case in point is the Global Position System (GPS). As is known to all, GPS can provide accurate positioning and standard time in the 98% regions of the world. I and my family always carry out self-driving travelling during the vocation, the GPS device play an essential role in this process. When we are driving on the road to the destination, the GPS momentarily remind us the travel way according to the presetting. When we are lost, GPS can help we find the right line. In the fact, we cannot live without the technology products, because they can solve lots of problems easily and make our lives simpler.
Therefore, it is more reasonable to think that technological achievements make people’s lives simpler because it is instrumental to a easily communication, information acquisition and a convenient life.

5.11二战，第一次发帖，望狠狠地批斗

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块