|
136 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing a game is fun only when you win. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everyone plays games sometimes. When it comes to whether playing a game is fun only when participants win, different people have different answers. Some argue that it is never to be fun unless they can win the game, while others think that failure or success does not indicate the value of game overall. As far as I am concerned, I prefer the latter. I will elaborate some key reasons as follows.
First of all, the purpose of games is not only to win or to beat contenders. Frequently, we play a game to spend our spare time as simple as that. Take myself as an example; I often play football with football enthusiasts when there is no class on the weekend. And thanks the pleasure climate created by playing, I can establish and boost a friendship with them in such a joyful manner. This is also a main belief of Olympic Games. In addition, playing games provide us opportunities to learn something outsides classrooms. For instance, by playing chess or cards, we shape our ways of thinking.
Second, in my point of view, it is a better way to win through losing. People who fail in a game can still benefit from the precious experience that winner cannot get firsthand. As a saying in English goes, “failure teaches success.” After the bitter taste, people can be more prudent and confident to embrace future competition.
Admittedly, no one wants to fail. But it is impossible for a person to win all the time. People should be prepared to face with the failure. And unlike wars, games are entertainment. So, take it easy.
In short, given reasons I have mentioned above, we can easily conclude that the fun of a game does not depend on whether participants win or lose the game. And I truly believe that a positive attitude of game does both the game but people’s life good.
发现没有人给我修改吗~
大家看看写得怎么样,好的话我要求加精华贴哦!
likui
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-3 12:13:25编辑过] |