ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a 5-to-4 decision,the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3804|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG 130 THEIR refers to

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-28 14:43:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG 130 THEIR refers to

130. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized(A)
(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of


Answer: A


their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
THEIR should refer to countries not tribes (As I understand), but why here it refers to later one?


OR we do not take care of it as long as it is not underlied?

沙发
发表于 2004-4-28 17:36:00 | 只看该作者

It seems that ETS tolerate more than one antecedent of a pronoun when the semantic antecedent can be clearly refered. When it comes to this subject, "their" refers to "Indians".

However, ETS deems it wrong that two same pronouns in one single sentence refer two different antecedent.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-28 21:26:00 | 只看该作者

ETS always, ALWAYS right.

Thank you tianwan.

地板
发表于 2004-8-7 02:35:00 | 只看该作者

their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
THEIR should refer to countries not tribes (As I understand), but why here it refers to later one?

为什么?我认为这里their 指代three tribes???

5#
发表于 2004-12-10 00:56:00 | 只看该作者
这样理解比较通,看最近的.这里最近的是印第安人的三个部落,所以THEIR指他们.
6#
发表于 2004-12-10 05:58:00 | 只看该作者

to three tribes of Oneida Indians 和for the unlawful seizure of....都是修饰restitution的,而主语是two upstate New York counties

such as:

Hostages owed restitution to Japan for their release.   这里的their 指 hostages,而不会指japan.

不知这样解释恰当否

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 14:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部