ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8151|回复: 26
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG130

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-14 13:33:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG130

130. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled(裁定) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.


(A)     that two upstate New York counties owed resti­tution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of


(B)     that two upstate New York counties owed resti­tution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of


(C)     two upstate New York counties to owe restitu­tion to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure offficeffice" />


(D)     on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized


(E)         on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of


Choice A, the best answer, uses that appropriately to introduce a clause that describes the Supreme Court's ruling; A also employs the idiomatic phrase restitution... for. In choice B, restitution... because of is not idiomatic. The plural pronouns their in B and C and they' in D are confusing as references to counties, especially since their refers to the Oneida in the phrase their ancestral lands. Choices C, D, and E each fail to use that to introduce the clause that explains the Court's ruling (用宾语从句就是为了说明判决结果); as a result, the phrasing in those choices is awkward, unidiomatic, and imprecise.


    

原文说counties因为unlawful seizurerestitution,如果按照这样的解释The plural pronouns their in B and C and they' in D are confusing as references to counties, especially since their refers to the Oneida in the phrase their ancestral lands不变成Oneidarestitution

沙发
发表于 2004-3-14 15:37:00 | 只看该作者
你说得没错,所以B,C,D都错。

板凳
发表于 2004-6-21 20:50:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思 请教一下

<A>中的 for 是 跟着restitution 来的吗 ?

og 的解释A also employs the idiomatic phrase restitution... for. In choice B, restitution... because of is not idiomatic

请问 如果B 中不要出现 代名词指代误谬 , because of ~~的用法 可以成立吗??

3Q

地板
发表于 2004-6-21 21:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用魚子醬秋天在2004-6-21 20:50:00的发言:

不好意思 请教一下

<A>中的 for 是 跟着restitution 来的吗 ?

og 的解释A also employs the idiomatic phrase restitution... for. In choice B, restitution... because of is not idiomatic

请问 如果B 中不要出现 代名词指代误谬 , because of ~~的用法 可以成立吗??

3Q

5#
发表于 2004-11-14 00:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用魚子醬秋天在2004-6-21 20:50:00的发言:

不好意思 请教一下






<A>中的 for 是 跟着restitution 来的吗 ?





og 的解释A also employs the idiomatic phrase restitution... for. In choice B, restitution... because of is not idiomatic





请问 如果B 中不要出现 代名词指代误谬 , because of ~~的用法 可以成立吗??



3Q







for表原因,是跟着owe来的,所以(B)还是错,即使代名词没问题。

6#
发表于 2005-2-4 03:33:00 | 只看该作者

求助:


这道题偶对正确答案没有疑问,


想请教 Rule that 宾从,


这个宾从里的谓语动词时态该如何判别呢?


跟着rule时态, 或者还是得从未划线部份判别?


如本题的owed


谢谢 !!

7#
发表于 2005-2-4 10:16:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(KoloveTu)求助:这道题偶对正确答案没有疑问...

根据ruled
8#
发表于 2005-5-12 15:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用KoloveTu在2005-2-4 3:33:00的发言:

求助:


这道题偶对正确答案没有疑问,


想请教 Rule that 宾从,


这个宾从里的谓语动词时态该如何判别呢?


跟着rule时态, 或者还是得从未划线部份判别?


如本题的owed


谢谢 !!


宾语从句的时态要根据逻辑意思,不能认为严格按照主句的动词,已经有过反例了

9#
发表于 2005-6-6 22:21:00 | 只看该作者
请问一下,这里的owe..to..和restitution..for..在句中怎么解释?
10#
发表于 2005-6-7 09:08:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-6 09:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部