- UID
- 804852
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
The lecturer believes that buzzing, an advertisingtactic/ marketing strategy, whichis claimed to be detrimental to us in the reading passage, would actually do noharm and even beneficial to the society.
To begin with, the buzzers really consider the productthey make compliments to is great. In fact, the company would only engage thosewho have used their products and really enjoys these items to serve as thebuzzer. Therefore, what buzzers do in their work is just to tell their authenticuser experience to the other consumers for the reason that they feel theseproducts are really good at heart. For instance, the lecturer ever promoted acertain phone to others because he really has some wonderful user-experiencewith it. Obviously, this fact is contrary to what the reading claims.
What's more, consumers are just as critical as usualwhen they encounter buzzers. When the lecturer promoted the phone to them, theywould ask a lot of questions about this product in detail, such as the price,the service and how long the lecturer used the product, and only afterthey get satisfactory answers will they purchase the buzzed product. Thus, thisfact totally contradicts the statement in the reading that person would believeswhatever he hear from the buzzer.
Finally, it will promote social relationships becausethe buzzers recommend the wonderful product to other people. In the readingmaterial, the author believes that buzzing is detrimental to the socialinteractions between people. However, that is not true. On the contrary, peoplewould be grateful to the buzzers in consequence of both the good items buzzers recommendto them from their personal experience and the sincere they receive frombuzzers. |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-11-29 18:33:35
收藏
收藏
