ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2554|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LZM R-4 解释我觉得不对,请讨论!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-6 16:48:00 | 只看该作者

LZM R-4 解释我觉得不对,请讨论!

26. Promotions, retirements, deaths, and other actions approved by the board of directors at its May meeting will be reported in the July 15 issue of the company paper.
(A) Promotions, retirements, deaths, and other actions approved by the board of directors at its May meeting will be reported in the July 15 issue of the company paper.
(B) Promotions, retirements, and other actions which have been approved at the May meeting of the board of directors along with deaths, with be reported in the July 15 issue of the company paper.
(C) To be reported in the July 15 issue of the company paper are the promotions, retirements, deaths, and other actions which were approved at the board of directors' May meeting.
(D) Meeting in May, the promotions, retirements, and other actions approved by the board of
directors, including obituaries, will be reported in the July 15 issue of the company paper.
(E) The July 15 issue of the company paper will report on promotions, retirements, and other actions approved by the board of directors at its May meeting; the paper will also include obituaries.


LZM的解释是逻辑搭配错, deaths approved 不存在,可是这样的说法非常常见,是符合语法的.请牛牛指教!

沙发
发表于 2004-6-6 17:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tulipmontreal在2004-6-6 16:48:00的发言:

LZM的解释是逻辑搭配错, deaths approved 不存在,可是这样的说法非常常见,是符合语法的.请牛牛指教!


常见?有例子吗?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-6 17:55:00 | 只看该作者

你用WWW.GOOGLE.COM搜索一下有很多的,要ADVANCE RESEARCH

地板
发表于 2004-6-6 18:53:00 | 只看该作者
death是自然生理现象,不能approved的
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-6 19:06:00 | 只看该作者

请看下面的连接 http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&btnG=Recherche+Google&as_epq=deaths+approved&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch


如果MARIE解释的对的话, 那为啥这个连接的里面可以呢


DEATHS APPROVED的意思是被证明的死亡人数, 偶的理解是因为有OTHER ACTIONS, DEATHS不是一个ACTION, 不能作为平行结构的一部分 所以A 错


我觉得这样理解最合适 请赐教!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-6 19:21:33编辑过]
6#
发表于 2004-6-7 00:25:00 | 只看该作者
嗯,有道理。不过现代英语里approve不再有“证明”这个意思了。
7#
发表于 2012-2-14 13:29:29 | 只看该作者
B 为什么不对呢,《GMAT语法POE宝典》里说是因为 过去分词定语 变成了 定语从句,违反了 简洁有效 的原则,个人觉得这个解释牵强不靠谱,我觉得应该是 meeting of the board of directors along with deaths 导致了意义含糊。各位牛牛认为捏?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 12:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部