今天做到这道题,表达一下对with和selling两种用法在这里的不同。从意思上讲,has become的结果不是sell 90000 tons,而题中也没有暗示因为selling 90000 tons使argentina变成leading exporter. 我觉得后面那个分句是补充说明leading exporter意味着什么,到底become leading exporter是什么含义。 因此无论是独立主格with还是selling做伴随动作或结果在意思上说不通。 再看语法结构,前面become是个系词(以前elory说过),Argentina has become leading exporter是主系表结构。 selling放在主系表结构后面,是对主语或表语(主系表中主语跟表语是一个东西)的补充说明,进一步说明leading exporter意味着selling 90000 tons to foreign markets. E选项刚好是这样,句尾的with是独立主格,修饰的是selling这个动作,表示伴随 这里我看到网上有个说法,with独立主格要作伴随状语只能放在句尾,不能跑到中间,如果跑到中间去,就变成了定语,修饰前面的名词: 例:The peaks of a mountain range, acting like rocks in a steambed, produce ripples in the air flowing over them: the resulting flow pattern, WITH crests and throughs that remain stationary although they're formed by rapidly moving air, are known as "standing waves". 请大牛们对这个说法发表看法。 -- by 会员 王Alcal1011 (2012/10/26 21:01:56)
I am a fan of this statement, but actually not quite sure
you should know that the usage of with is more annoying than ving
do you remember the structure in OG?
S, ving, vo ( the classic example of neuroscientists )
ving here is a noun modifier , modifying the subject
I think the same applies here
but just be cautious about this overall conclusion (although I can not raise any counter-example about this statement in the official source)
this issue is rarely or even not tested in GMAT |