ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4089|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[语文] no长阅读一道题···

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-18 17:55:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes to mental experience appeared rather discouraging. Such variations in size, shape, chemistry, conduction speed, excitation threshold, and the like as had been demonstrated in nerve cells remained negligible in significance for any possible correlation with the manifold dimensions of mental experience.

Near the turn of the century, it had been suggested by Hering that different modes of sensation, such as pain, taste, and color, might be correlated with the discharge of specific kinds of nervous energy. However, subsequently developed methods of recording and analyzing nerve potentials failed to reveal any such qualitative diversity. It was possible to demonstrate by other methods refined structural differences among neuron types; however, proof was lacking that the quality of the impulse or its condition was influenced by these differences, which seemed instead to influence the developmental patterning of the neural circuits. Although qualitative variance among nerve energies was never rigidly disproved, the doctrine was generally abandoned in favor of the opposing view, namely, that nerve impulses are essentially homogeneous in quality and are transmitted as “common currency” throughout the nervous system. According to this theory, it is not the quality of the sensory nerve (sensory nerve: 感觉神经) impulses that determines the diverse conscious sensations they produce, but rather the different areas of the brain into which they discharge, and there is some evidence for this view. In one experiment, when an electric stimulus was applied to a given sensory field of the cerebral cortex of a conscious human subject, it produced a sensation of the appropriate modality (modality: n.形式, 形态, 特征) for that particular locus, that is, a visual sensation from the visual cortex, an auditory sensation from the auditory cortex, and so on. Other experiments revealed slight variations in the size, number, arrangement, and interconnection of the nerve cells, but as far as psychoneural correlations were concerned, the obvious similarities of these sensory fields to each other seemed much more remarkable than any of the minute differences.

However, cortical locus, in itself, turned out to have little explanatory value. Studies showed that sensations as diverse as those of red, black, green, and white, or touch, cold, warmth, movement, pain, posture, and pressure apparently may arise through activation of the same cortical areas. What seemed to remain was some kind of differential patterning effects in the brain excitation: it is the difference in the central distribution of impulses that counts. In short, brain theory suggested a correlation between mental experience and the activity of relatively homogeneous nerve-cell units conducting essentially homogeneous impulses through homogeneous cerebral tissue. To match the multiple dimensions of mental experience psychologists could only point to a limitless variation in the spatiotemporal patterning of nerve impulses.

第二段最后一句话什么意思啊?
“Other experiments revealed slight variations in the size, number, arrangement, and interconnection of the nerve cells, but as far as psychoneural correlations were concerned, the obvious similarities of these sensory fields to each other seemed much more remarkable than any of the minute differences.”

怎么觉着这句话是说sensory fields都很相似?那不是就证明前面sensory field决定sensation的理论是错误的?那么这一题C 怎么不对?
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s opinion of the suggestion that different areas of the brain determine perceptions produced by sensory nerve impulses?

(A) It is a plausible explanation, but it has not been completely proved.

(B) It is the best explanation of brain processes currently available.

(C) It is disproved by the fact that the various areas of the brain are physiologically very similar.

(D) There is some evidence to support it, but it fails to explain the diversity of mental experience.D

(E) There is experimental evidence that confirms its correctness.






Which of the following best summarizes the author’s opinion of the suggestion that different areas of the brain determine perceptions produced by sensory nerve impulses?

(A) It is a plausible explanation, but it has not been completely proved.

(B) It is the best explanation of brain processes currently available.

(C) It is disproved by the fact that the various areas of the brain are physiologically very similar.

(D) There is some evidence to support it, but it fails to explain the diversity of mental experience.D

(E) There is experimental evidence that confirms its correctness.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-18 20:08:42 | 只看该作者
求解答
板凳
发表于 2012-10-18 20:58:26 | 只看该作者
as far as 这句插入语说直到phy...这个东西被考虑到为止,一直是similarty>differences,所以现在反过来了。。。然后前面一句也明确说明了有实验证明这个理论。
地板
发表于 2012-10-18 21:35:04 | 只看该作者
"In one experiment, when an electric stimulus was applied to a given sensory field of the cerebral cortex of a conscious human subject, it produced a sensation of the appropriate modality (modality: n.形式, 形态, 特征) for that particular locus, that is, a visual sensation from the visual cortex, an auditory sensation from the auditory cortex, and so on. Other experiments revealed slight variations in the size, number, arrangement, and interconnection of the nerve cells, but as far as psychoneural correlations were concerned, the obvious similarities of these sensory fields to each other seemed much more remarkable than any of the minute differences."

這是兩個EXAMPLES AUTHOR 用來SUPPORT BRAIN MODALITY 的理論,所以這是EVIDENCE SUPPORT WE HAVE STRCTURAL DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN

"However, cortical locus, in itself, turned out to have little explanatory value. "

轉折, 說明BRAIN AREAS FAIL TO EXPLAIN DIVERSITY OF EXPERIENCES
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-18 21:43:07 | 只看该作者
as far as 这句插入语说直到phy...这个东西被考虑到为止,一直是similarty>differences,所以现在反过来了。。。然后前面一句也明确说明了有实验证明这个理论。
-- by 会员 sky9219 (2012/10/18 20:58:26)


恕小弟愚钝 还是没明白您意思。。。

Other experiments revealed slight variations in the size, number, arrangement, and interconnection of the nerve cells, but as far as psychoneural correlations were concerned, the obvious similarities of these sensory fields to each other seemed much more remarkable than any of the minute differences.

您意思是说这句话前半句 “Other experiments revealed slight variations in the size, number, arrangement, and interconnection of the nerve cells,”是证明这个理论?
而后半句是说以前的情况(similarty>differences)也就是与这个理论相反?
6#
发表于 2012-10-19 10:42:43 | 只看该作者
我说的前面一句是指这句的前面那句,不是前半句。
总之  第二段最后两句的意思是:现在有实验证明了区域理论。另外实验表明神经细胞的差异很小,直到psychoneural correlations者个东西被我们考虑之前,与similarty比起来差异是很小的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-8 14:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部