TPO33 小作文
The lecture apparently disproves what is argued in the reading material.According to the passage, the purpose and meaning of the carved stone balls werenot clear and the author provides three posible theories to speculate them.However, the professor refutes each of the theories with explicite evidences. At the very begining, contrary to the belief that the carved stone ballswere used as weapons, the lecture assert that if it's true, the balls caneasily be cracked, but most of them were well preserved with no damage. This,to some extent, suggests the carved stone balls were not used as weopons. What's more, the reading concieves that the carved stone balls were usedto measure weight which doesn't convince the professor either. She contendsthat the balls are of different types thus have diffrent density which meansballs of the same size can have varies of weight. Last but not least, the reading states that the carved stone ballsserved as the representation of social status. The professor contradicts to itwith the evidence that the balls are of intricate design ranging fromcomplicate patterns to simple graphs and, further more, they haven't been foundin the graves of people with high social status. Thus they have no possibilitiesto repesent social status.
|