关于夹心修饰我的一点总结，求指正

86274619hua · 发表于 2015-8-11 10:33:17

论坛上很多人说S,+ING,V+O一般不会是夹心修饰，我觉得这个不对，对于夹心我觉得应该却别对待。对于像be动词这样的是不会造成夹心的，因为系表结构不存在动词修饰，同样的对于表达就是这个S的情况，应该也不会出现夹心修饰。但对于实意动词，可能出现夹心，举个例子，Peter,walking towards me, talks about sth，就有可能出现夹心。
希望大牛指正

86274619hua · 发表于 2015-8-11 17:11:34

大神来看下

zbyloveinter · 发表于 2015-8-12 05:07:31

没太看明白LZ想要表达什么
我建议LZ最好使用GMAT的例句，因为很多其他来源的例句、甚至自己造的句子会不符合GMAT的规范

86274619hua · 发表于 2015-8-12 12:47:28

zbyloveinter 发表于 2015-8-12 05:07
没太看明白LZ想要表达什么
我建议LZ最好使用GMAT的例句，因为很多其他来源的例句、甚至自己造的句子会不符 ...

同意！

86274619hua · 发表于 2015-8-12 12:49:08

86274619hua 发表于 2015-8-12 12:47
同意！

就是考虑从系动词角度考虑夹心，区别N,VING,S+V+O和n,ving,v+o两种夹心结构。第二种要看实意动词是不是起到类似系动词的作用

86274619hua · 发表于 2015-8-12 13:14:00

86274619hua 发表于 2015-8-11 17:11
大神来看下

刚好看到别人开了个帖，用他的例子。我觉得刚好印证了前面说的：对于系动词区别对待
Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating international disputes over uninhabited islands.这里逻辑主语千行里说是错误的，我总感觉可以是伴随结果？
3）Five fledgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised transplants from Norway began in 1975.
这是正确句子，类比一下2）为什么这个的逻辑主语就正确了呢？

86274619hua · 发表于 2015-8-12 14:29:32

zbyloveinter 发表于 2015-8-12 05:07
没太看明白LZ想要表达什么
我建议LZ最好使用GMAT的例句，因为很多其他来源的例句、甚至自己造的句子会不符 ...

就是考虑从系动词角度考虑夹心，区别N,VING,S+V+O和n,ving,v+o两种夹心结构。第二种要看实意动词是不是起到类似系动词的作用

zbyloveinter · 发表于 2015-8-12 15:33:24

这个跟夹心修饰毫无关系，这个是GMAT典型的comma + Ving句型

Ron:
the "comma + ing" modifier should only be used when:

(A)
it MODIFIES THE ENTIRE ACTION of the preceding clause, and it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that clause;

AND

(B)
one of the following is true:
(1) the "ing" action is SIMULTANEOUS with the main action;
- i ran down the sidewalk, flapping my arms wildly
(2) the "ing" action is a DIRECT CONSEQUENCE of the main action.
- i got a 100 on the most recent exam, bringing my average up to 91

other examples:

Joe ran down the sidewalk, flailing his arms.
--> correct (simultaneous)

My cousin took extra classes every semester in college, graduating in three years.
--> correct, because the "ing" is an actual consequence of the first action.

My cousin ate frozen food every day in college, graduating in three years.
--> incorrect, because there is no relationship (in particular, the second thing is not a consequence of the first thing, and isn't simultaneous either).

你自己体会一下
平时做题时也请多留意，这个是GMAT最常考的题型之一

bonboncase · 发表于 2015-8-25 10:29:35

86274619hua 发表于 2015-8-12 13:14
刚好看到别人开了个帖，用他的例子。我觉得刚好印证了前面说的：对于系动词区别对待
Even tiny islets ca ...

对于错误选项Ron的解释
COMMA + -ING modifiers must modify the preceding clause, but the -ING participle must also apply to the subject of the preceding clause.
therefore, the use of that comma+ing modifier would imply that the islets themselves are stimulating disputes. that's not true.

[SC总结] 关于夹心修饰我的一点总结，求指正

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()