陷进去的verbal 54题，从C~E求牛牛帮忙分析

ivansmile33 · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:24:09

1.
A patient accusing a doctor of
malpractice will find it difficult to prove damage if there is a lack of
some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.

(A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify

(B) unless there will be another doctor to testify

(C) without another doctor’s testimony

(D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor（C）

(E) lacking another doctor to testify

C的without 是修饰做伴随修饰全句呢还是修饰damage呢？

D的should 弱弱的问是省略了if的倒装么？能说的详细点么？这个知识点我一直理解不了？
E的lacking 引导的短语是应该修饰lacking，那在lacking之前加一个逗号，这个句子是不是就对了呢？

说到without，想到了verbal的70题：
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's.

A.extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
B.extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
C.extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
D.extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
E.extinction, now with numbers five times greater than

D和E的with如果用CD推荐的方法看（http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-80567-1-1.html），那是修饰宾语，也就是brush？则错误。

HarrisZheng · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:47:45

C 做状语修饰全句
D 是的 if you should have any question 倒装 should you have any question
E 放在句首会好些

维以不永伤6 · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:52:39

你说的verbal是什么资料，，，作为一个才刷了一遍OG的人来说发现我对应不了题号。

楼主太纠结语法了。。。

C。也不是一个修饰语，without是表示一种情况，是一个状语。
D。should（只有情态动词是should的时候才能这样倒）倒装表示强调，但是在GMAT里面是不成立的，难道这道题选D？
E。不应该加一个逗号，加一个破折号而且lack的那个句子是个完整句就对了，表示解释为什么difficult to prove damage.

sisichen666 · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:54:05

C：without=if not引导条件句，对应前文的will
D：不全就是if there should be no testimomy...(是将if省略，should提前的一种变式）
E：lacking在句尾即使加上逗号含义也不可能对，lack testimony在应该是一个条件，lacking在句尾不能表达出这层含义

sisichen666 · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:55:22

建议LZ好好复习看看总结一下OG吧。。。基础知识很是纠结呀~~~~~

ivansmile33 · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:55:30

嗯，确实E放句首更好，真心感谢。
还有一个问题想请教：
说到without，想到了verbal的70题：
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's.

A.extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
B.extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
C.extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
D.extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
E.extinction, now with numbers five times greater than

D和E的with如果用CD推荐的方法看（http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-80567-1-1.html），那是修饰宾语，也就是brush？则错误。

ivansmile33 · 发表于 2012-9-25 22:56:43

就是og的语文啊。。。。。。单独的一本，我刚入门么，所以在纠结纠结语法中..........

ivansmile33 · 发表于 2012-9-25 23:02:01

放句子开头应该可以吧？啊，我都不知道放在句尾为什么不能表达出这种含义，好丢脸

能告诉我why么？

是滴哦，我og才刷第二遍，而且我语法特别差，所以问题菜很多......不要怪我纠结语法啊，小猫，我想先弄懂了再做题做出经验，后面不用分析也就知道啦，谢谢你啦。

ivansmile33 · 发表于 2012-9-25 23:02:58

还有一个问题想请教：
说到without，想到了verbal的70题：
The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's.

A.extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
B.extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
C.extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
D.extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
E.extinction, now with numbers five times greater than

D和E的with如果用CD推荐的方法看（http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-80567-1-1.html），那是修饰宾语，也就是brush？则错误。

sisichen666 · 发表于 2012-9-25 23:12:55

逗号的原因引起了with的修饰歧义。。。

本贴相关题目 OG-2017V-SC-208 | GMATPrep-2007E2-SC-146OG-2017V-SC-208 |
OG-2016V-SC-20 |
OG-2015V-SC-70 |
GMATPrep-2007E2-SC-146
... (TWTJ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

陷进去的verbal 54题，从C~E求牛牛帮忙分析

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2017V-SC-208 | GMATPrep-2007E2-SC-146OG-2017V-SC-208 | OG-2016V-SC-20 | OG-2015V-SC-70 | GMATPrep-2007E2-SC-146 ... (TWTJ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

陷进去的verbal 54题，从C~E求牛牛帮忙分析

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2017V-SC-208 | GMATPrep-2007E2-SC-146OG-2017V-SC-208 |
OG-2016V-SC-20 |
OG-2015V-SC-70 |
GMATPrep-2007E2-SC-146
... (TWTJ)