If you regard social ability as one of the most significant skills, if you never ignore the importance of your health, if you want to be a competitive job hunter in such a competitive market, there is no doubt that you will stand by my side to become an insistent supporter of the statement that the colleges should provide sports and social activities as much financial support as classes and libraries.
First of all, nothing is better than attending the social activities yourself can directly improve your social ability. Surely some introduction classes may provide a guide, but activity experience is the best professor. It's obvious that no one could become a social star without contacting and communicating with others. The more financial support from colleges, the more social activities can be held, and the more practical chances the students will have.
Additionally, we cannot emphasize the importance of health too much. A brilliant student without a strong body is just like a well-designed machine without sufficient power. We have heard too many excellent young employees died every year just for a bad health condition. What a serious lost it is of our society. So it definitely pays to encourage the college students doing more sports by building gyms or more exercise facilities.
Finally, it is universally acknowledged that the norm to judge whether an employee is qualified have not just focused on the knowledge any more. Only an all-round developed student can be an attractive candidate among the competitors. How to become an all-round developed student ? Concentrate both on extracurricular activities and professional knowledge. It should be well recognized by universities as well as by students.
All in all, considering the charming advantages the students will get from the social activities, health and the all-round development, why cannot the colleges provide equal financial supports to sports and social activities.
The reading material and the lecture have both discussed the problem of shortening workweek. The lecture apprently refutes the statement illustrated in the reading material. Actually , the lecturer insists that a shorten workweek will be disadvantaged to both companies and individuals where the passage is definitely on the opposites.
First of all, the passage claims that companies could benefit themselves from the shortened workweek. In contrast, the professor points out that actually a shortened workweek will make the companies cost more. To hire more staff means that the company needs to pay more for the employee training and medical ensurance. Besides, the more workers, the more office space is required. All of the above will pernish companies' profits.
Secondly, it's obviously shown in the reading material that a shortened workweek will reduce unemployment rate , while the lecturer cast doubt on that the higher hiring costs will engage the companies to increase the worker's burden instead hiring more. The companies may set a higer expectation to the workers by asking the original group of staff to finish the 5 day's work in 4 days. In this way, no more employees will be needed.
Finally, the passage argues that a shortended worweek is better for individuals. Contrary to that, the professor states that the employees' work ability will be weakened on the shortened workweek condition. The companies may perfer to hire the workers who agree to work 5 days a week and promote them. As a result, the employees who'd like to work 4 days a week will first lose their jobs.
In conclusion, the professor's illustration opposes to the writer's expectation on the problem of shortening workweek.
As a basic rule of being honest, we cannot emphasize the importance of telling the truth too much. Not only the simplest but efficient way to be respected, telling the truth is also a touchstone to true friends. What's more, there is no doubt that truth tellers are the definitely needed representation of the traditional culture nowadays.
At the very beginning, truth tellers will always receive the respects from the people around. Various as the way to be respected is, being responsible is always an significant one. When dealing a project with coworkers, when making a presentation with classmates, when playing a game with friends, truth tellers must be a responsible member who can help the team achieve the target efficiently as well as effectively. They are the ones deserved the respects.
Secondly, maybe a truth teller would have too many friends, but they never lack true friends. There is an old saying that only true friend tells truth. I admitted that truth tellers usually leave an aggressive impression on the others, however the brilliant ones will understand their honesties. Take my roommate Mike as an example, yes-man Mike is always surrounded by a lot of guys, they walking together, playing together, and chatting together. But each time when Mike encountered a trouble, they all disappeared. Only honesty can buy honesty.
What's more, telling the truth reflects our traditional culture in such a society which is full of cheat and lies. What a tragedy that everyone just cheats for getting a better job or earn more salaries. As a precious treasure, we should never forget the traditions of honesty. Why not just start from telling the truth?
As a conclusion, if you want to be respected, if you want to make true friends, if you love our traditional culture. Start from being a turth teller.
The reading material and the lecture have both discussed whether employees should work as a team. The lecture apparently refutes the statement illustrated in the reading material. Actually, the lecturer insists that working as team will suffer more disadvantages where the passage is just on the opposites.
First of all, the passage claims that a team will get more knowledge, experience and skills than individuals. In contrast, the professor points out that there will be more free rider in a team who won't make any contributes. But when the project succeeds, both the real contributors and the free riders are equally traded, because they are a team.
Secondly, it's obviously shown in the reading material that working as a team will solve the problem more quickly and creative, while the lecturer cast doubt on that it is much more difficult to reach a consensus as too many meetings to hold among the team members.
Finally, the passage argues that the team members can be rewarding more. Contrary to that, the professor states that the team leaders may probably not consider the suggestions from the other members in the team. But if the project falls, the whole team will take the responsibilities. So the leaders will trend to ignore the others while making decisions.
In conclusion, the professor's illustration opposes to the writer's expectation on the problem of working as team.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-8-24 10:55:15
收藏
收藏
楼主
