ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1929|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文互改] Issue 求拍,各位大神虐死我吧!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-23 15:07:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting
it passively.


The author asserts that skeptical thinking should always be taken in to the study of students instead of accepting what they are taught passively. While, from some aspect, this assertion overstates the significant of skeptical thinking by using the word "always" and did not constrain the range of students, I generally agree with the author's assertion.

It is an observable fact that skeptical thinking plays a critical role in the long term of the development of among all subjects including science, art and law. The knowledge system of science especially physics is establishing on questioning the old principle without a stop. People discovered the fact that the earth is not center of the universe through observation by inventing a new device such as universal telescope after questioning the older authoritative theory that the earth is the center of the universe. If our ancestor never question this false theory, maybe we can never understand other mystery phenomenon of the gigantic space above the titanic ground let along the prevalent founding of the principle of gravity which concludes by Newton-the most famous physicist in the science history-and the invention of the space shuttle which can bring astronauts to space and showing the actual view of space to us.

To have skeptical thinking is also exerted a far-reaching to students who are acquiring knowledge for that they are anticipated to use knowledge they learned instead to become a machine merely record them. There is an old saying in ancient China tells students that learning without thinking is useless and harmful by the great educationist and ideologist Confusius. Moreover, a student who can only accept knowledge passively and without question them cannot have wildly innovation in his future study and career particularly for the college student who is acquiring a large amount of controvercial and unjustified theory which maybe fallacy after persistent questioning and demonstrating. College students should be rigorously to keep asking "Why," and "Why not" when they confront new theories and hypothesis to bring the exact truth to light.

Nevertheless, things become different when it happens on primary students or others who are admitted low education, since what they learn is almost common sense and basic theory which are considered as an axiom without any necessary of skeptic. Primary students will become cynical and difficult to get further education or other detrimental conterproductive if they are question these basic principles.

To sum up, skepticism is quite valuable for the advancement of human civilization, especially students are supposed to question but not simply accept what they learn. Consequently, skeptical thinking should be encouraged among all but elementary levels of education.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-8-24 09:14:05 | 只看该作者
Primary students will become cynical and difficult to get further education or other detrimental conterproductive if they are question these basic principles.

if they are question these basic principles.  什么意思?不make sense..
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-24 19:44:23 | 只看该作者
就是如果小学生或者其他的初学者总是质疑基本的理论和尝试容易变得愤世嫉俗,或者产生其他有害的反作用?
写的不对么??  能怎么改呢??
地板
发表于 2012-8-24 21:55:38 | 只看该作者
我觉得这个题目既然已经提到了被动接受,那么你需要对被动接受做一个分析,否则你还是不能体现出质疑的好处
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-26 19:41:11 | 只看该作者
恩恩,楼上说的对
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-27 15:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部