ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2221|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问一个in order to题,谢谢!!!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-30 16:43:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
36套第21套
Popular art, has a number of meanings, impossible to define with any precision, which range from folklore to junk. The poles are clear enough, but the middle tends to blur. The Hollywood Western of the 1930‘s, for example, has elements of folklore, but is closer to junk than to high art or folk art. There can be great trash, just as there is bad high art. The musicals of George Gershwin are great popular art, never aspiring to high art. Schubert and Brahms, however, used elements of popular music—folk themes—in works clearly intended as high art. The case of Verdi is a different one: he took a popular genre—bourgeois melodrama set to music (an accurate definition of nineteenth-century opera)—and, without altering its fundamental nature, transmuted it into high art.



6. The author refers to Schubert and Brahms in order
to suggest
(A) that their achievements are no less substantial
than those of Verdi
(B) that their works are examples of great trash
(C) the extent to which Schubert and Brahms
influenced the later compositions of Verdi
(D) a contrast between the conventions of
nineteenth-century opera and those of
other musical forms
(E) that popular music could be employed in
compositions intended as high art


为什么选E,我觉得按in order to题目的做法B怎么不行呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-7-30 22:00:37 | 只看该作者
前面说得是can be great trash,这句都however了,肯定不是B啊
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-30 22:27:27 | 只看该作者
前面说得是can be great trash,这句都however了,肯定不是B啊
-- by 会员 zhenkai (2012/7/30 22:00:37)

哦。。。对,非常感谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 11:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部