og sc 17 og的小菜对于解释不大懂，so，@help~~

bob9603 · 发表于 2012-7-8 21:11:09

The commission has directed advertisers to
restrict the use of the word “natural” to foods that
do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical
preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

(A) or nothing that has been
(B) or that has been
(C) and nothing that is
(D) or anything that has been
(E) and anything

体会做，但是不大懂og中，B的解释~~~求nn解惑~~

B Th at has been synthesized distorts the
meaning by referring to foods, rather than
to something added to a food.

bob9603 · 发表于 2012-7-8 21:11:27

小菜顶一下

bob9603 · 发表于 2012-7-8 21:25:03

ivyxiaoxiao · 发表于 2012-7-8 21:39:22

OR是一个平行标志

本句原意是要用that做定语，修饰前面的anything. 而B造成了that修饰前面的foods. 改变了句意！

bob9603 · 发表于 2012-7-8 22:21:54

OR是一个平行标志

本句原意是要用that做定语，修饰前面的anything. 而B造成了that修饰前面的foods. 改变了句意！

-- by 会员 ivyxiaoxiao (2012/7/8 21:39:22)

原来如此，是修饰到了foods，也就是说和前面的that并列喽，谢谢啦~~

本贴相关题目 OG-2016-SC-20OG-2016-SC-20
OG-2015-SC-21
OG-13-SC-21
OG-12-SC-17
... (ZQDY)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

og sc 17 og的小菜对于解释不大懂，so，@help~~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2016-SC-20OG-2016-SC-20OG-2015-SC-21OG-13-SC-21OG-12-SC-17 ... (ZQDY)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

og sc 17 og的小菜对于解释不大懂，so，@help~~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2016-SC-20OG-2016-SC-20
OG-2015-SC-21
OG-13-SC-21
OG-12-SC-17
... (ZQDY)