ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1413|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

还有一周考试,第一篇AA,希望有NN帮忙改一下~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-16 16:12:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目是这个月的狗狗之一
The following appeared in a memorandum from the director of human resources to the executive officers of

Company X: “Last year, we surveyed our employees on improvements needed at Company X by having them rank, in order of importance, the issues presented in a list of possible improvements. Improved communications between employees and management was consistently ranked as the issue of highest importance by the employees who responded to the survey. As you know, we have since instituted regular communications sessions conducted by high-level management, which the employees can attend on a voluntary basis. Therefore, it is likely that most employees at Company X now feel that the improvement most needed at the company has been made.”

Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

这个是我的AA处女作……

In this argument, the author concludes that employees at Company X now is likely to feel that the most necessary improvement has been made. The reasons offered to support this conclusion is that among the issued that employees have responded to the survey, improved communication between employees and management was put in the first place and the Company X has made the improvement through instituting routinely communications sessions. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

To begin with, the accuracy of the survey is doubtful, since no evidence has been demonstrated in the argument that the way the company X committed the survey is reasonable. Considerations such as whether the sample employees involved in the survey is representative or not and whether the employees submit their responds in anonymous should all be answered, otherwise the result of the survey is worthless, since these considerations could, directly or indirectly, affect the accuracy of the result.(是否要进一步说明不考虑两个whether的内容会如何影响accuracy)

Secondly, the author falsely assumes that whether institute regular communications sessions or not is the only decisive factor of improving communications between employees and management. However, it is not necessarily the case. For instance, is it reluctant for employees to communicate with the manager voluntarily? Or Is the manager unwilling to accept the opinions from employees? If the answers to both questions are “Yes”, the communication between the employees and management could still be less likely to be improved, so the employees will not feel the improvement.

In conclusion, the author fails to show the accuracy of the survey and to rule out other possible factors which could decide the effect of the communication improvement. To strengthen the argument, the author should provide evidence that the sample employees are reprensentative and that other than the institution of communication sessions, no factor is more decisive and influential.

语言啥的不抱太大提升希望,希望NN们能帮忙看看论述段的分析还有没有要改进的~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-4-19 07:28:19 | 只看该作者
我不是大牛,但是一看就觉得字数少,放到word里数一下,果然才300。
再多凑100出来吧。
至于结构啥的,让大牛们来评吧
板凳
发表于 2012-4-20 17:22:02 | 只看该作者
good
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-22 20:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部