Prep-SC2-69 求教一道prep的语法题，老prep和新prep的解释不一样啊？

ChristinaKK · 发表于 2012-5-22 18:24:50

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of
high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the
Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000
in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek
up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
答案是C，老prep这么解释的答案C 正确, lead to the passage强调了结果;which非限定定语从句修饰Act,意思表达清楚;时间状语in
1999紧靠修饰对象the passage,修饰无歧意;用of selling修饰名词intent表达正确
答案A 错误：从逻辑意思上看The proliferation…导致的结果是反域名强占保护法案的通过,而不是通过的过程, 因此passing应该改为passage,强调结果.in 1999既可能修饰Act也可能修饰passing,导致修饰不清；分词结构allowing…修饰有歧义。

但是新prep上明明说了act, law, decree这类的词后面用ing说明具体内容啊。为什么到了这个题目上allowing就变成修饰有歧义了？

ChristinaKK · 发表于 2012-5-22 18:26:14

如：
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
A.   requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B.   requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C.   that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D.   to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E.   to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

题目释义：Last week local shrimpers held a conference …, saying that their compliance … is protecting …
考点：
1.   主谓一致
2.   描述法律法规的内容要用ing分词短语修饰，如；除非表达的是法规的目的，laws后面不能用to do修饰，而应该用doing.
3.   With独立主格的名词后面不能跟不定式

icyjeannelij · 发表于 2012-5-22 20:50:36

我首先就排除了A项,因为我觉得passing和passage都对，但是用passing的动名词形式的话，那表达也应该是“the passing of”。原句的passing用法不是动名词，而是动词的ing形式，那就需要一个主语。而原句里面没有任何类似权威机构这样的主语引领这个pass动词。

12604698 · 发表于 2012-5-23 09:42:13

（1）曼哈顿：强调名词的内容“通过”如果有名词就不要用动名词形式。
（2）1L的例子与原题的不同之处就是少了个逗号。这个区别就大了。
，ving形式优先作状语，动作发起者是前面的主语。没有逗号只能作定语修饰前面挨着的那个名词。
原题allowing做状语就是proliferation allow了。

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-800 | GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-178OG-2017-SC-800 |
OG-2016-SC-134 |
OG-2015-SC-133 |
OG-13-SC-133 |
OG-12-SC-133 |
GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-178
... (XLWR)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

Prep-SC2-69 求教一道prep的语法题，老prep和新prep的解释不一样啊？

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-800 | GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-178OG-2017-SC-800 | OG-2016-SC-134 | OG-2015-SC-133 | OG-13-SC-133 | OG-12-SC-133 | GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-178 ... (XLWR)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

Prep-SC2-69 求教一道prep的语法题，老prep和新prep的解释不一样啊？

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

本贴相关题目 OG-2017-SC-800 | GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-178OG-2017-SC-800 |
OG-2016-SC-134 |
OG-2015-SC-133 |
OG-13-SC-133 |
OG-12-SC-133 |
GMATPrep-2008E1-SC-178
... (XLWR)