ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4435|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

(AAA13)请教一个AA的提纲(新增题A13)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-13 16:21:00 | 只看该作者

(AAA13)请教一个AA的提纲(新增题A13)

The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of the Fizzle Soda Company.

"THere is apparently a market for new beverages, as can be seen from the fact that other companies have recently introduced new juice drinks and sports drinks. Given this market and customer surveys indicating that many drinkers of regular Fizzle soda add chocolate syrup to their soda, we can increase our company's sales by creating a new chocolate-flavored soda, 'choco-Fizz.' Choco-Fizz will help us attract new customers and keep our customers who might otherwise switch to our competitors' chocolate beverages. And choch-Fizz will be more successful than Fizzle plus, our most recently introduced flavor, because it will be easier to distinguish from regular Fizzle soda."

觉得攻击点挺多但是好像都不得力。请大家帮忙看看!谢谢


沙发
发表于 2004-9-14 00:08:00 | 只看该作者

The fact that other companies start to introduce new beverages does not necessarily mean that there is a market for these beverages.

Even if we take it for granted that such a market does exist, we cannot mimic their operations by introducing a new beverage without ruling out the possibility that the market has become saturated with the beverages newly introduced by these companies.

Is the customer survey representative enough?

The arguer fails to establish a reasonable cause-effect relationship by arguing that the choch-fizz will be more successful than Fizzle Plus simply because the former is easier to distinguish from regular fizzle soda. Without providing pertinent information to demonstrate the advantage of choch-fizz versus Fizzle plus, the arguer make an fragile assertion open to attacks.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-14 09:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mariezhu在2004-9-14 0:08:00的发言:

The fact that other companies start to introduce new beverages does not necessarily mean that there is a market for these beverages.


Even if we take it for granted that such a market does exist, we cannot mimic their operations by introducing a new beverage without ruling out the possibility that the market has become saturated with the beverages newly introduced by these companies.


Is the customer survey representative enough?


The arguer fails to establish a reasonable cause-effect relationship by arguing that the choch-fizz will be more successful than Fizzle Plus simply because the former is easier to distinguish from regular fizzle soda. Without providing pertinent information to demonstrate the advantage of choch-fizz versus Fizzle plus, the arguer make an fragile assertion open to attacks.


谢谢!!!就是最后一点我觉得难攻击,原来是我自己犯了想当然的错误

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 16:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部