ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3404|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11(黄)-SC-63时态问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-4 03:45:00 | 只看该作者

OG11(黄)-SC-63时态问题

63.   A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.

(A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are

(B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are

(C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns have been

(D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns are

(E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals’ horns have been

Logical predication + Diction + Verb form

The tourists are visiting for the purpose of seeing the rhinoceroses; purpose is expressed by using to, not by and. Since their could refer to either tourists or to rhinoceroses, it is inappropriately ambiguous whose horns are being trimmed. The verb following after should be the present perfect have been trimmed to reflect that the trimming must occur before the tourists arrive. When only two alternatives are possible, to continue to visit or not to continue to visit, whether (or whether or not) is properly used rather than if.

A     And see should be to see, their is ambiguous; are should be have been

B     Omitting rhinoceroses changes the meaning of the sentence; one has no referent; their absurdly and unambiguously refers to tourists; are should be have been

C     Correct. In this sentence, to correctly precedes see, it is clear that the horns belong to the animals; have been is the correct tense following once.

D     Whether is preferred to if, and see should be to see-, are should be have been

E      Whether is preferred to if, one has no referent

想问下如果不是用的have been而是are 是否也勉强可以(也就是说have been 不是一个唯一正确的答案,但是是一个更好的答案)?如果把它看作一个普通的条件从句的话,我们不是常常用一般现在时表示将来的么?

沙发
发表于 2008-8-5 10:10:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得不可以。本题的问题就是:人们会不会因为犀牛被割掉角了,就不去公园看犀牛了。犀牛角被割一定是在人们去公园看之前完成了的,所以要用完成时。
板凳
发表于 2008-8-8 02:20:00 | 只看该作者

同意lu的解释

地板
发表于 2008-8-8 02:28:00 | 只看该作者
覺得are也可以
用解釋中的其他考點去eliminate吧...
5#
发表于 2008-8-15 21:50:00 | 只看该作者
B把their改成its就对了,因为前面是one
6#
发表于 2008-8-15 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
在汇总的帖子里有精彩的解释,自己去看看吧
7#
发表于 2008-8-15 23:45:00 | 只看该作者
请问汇总的帖子怎么找啊?谢谢
8#
发表于 2008-8-16 00:32:00 | 只看该作者

once A have been done, B.....

using "have been" to emphasize that A happened before B and A is a cause for B's happening.

9#
发表于 2008-8-16 00:33:00 | 只看该作者
I noticed that in GMAT, whenever "have done" is used, there is always logic in it.........
10#
发表于 2008-8-27 06:38:00 | 只看该作者
汇总贴就是OG语法区里的OG讲解。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 22:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部