饭饭求一个句子分析~~O(∩_∩)O~

泾渭不凡 · 发表于 2012-1-30 15:32:36

The council granted the right to make legal petition to city official.

What does the phrase "to city official" mean? Did the city officials receive the right to make legal petitions? Or did someone else receive the right to make petitions to the officials? Eithe way, the correct sentence should resolve the ambiguity:

The council granted city officials the right to make legal petitions.
The right to make legal petitions to city officials was granted by the council.

饭饭真心觉得第二句仍然歧义啊：
“The right to make legal petitions to city officials was granted by the council.”
求分析啊~~谢谢~~！

清飞扬 · 发表于 2012-1-30 15:54:28

一看到第二句结构就是错的，直接排掉
1. 有违主动的原则，能够用主动的竟然用了被动。不是说被动不可以，但是被动的表达通常是在不知行为操作的agent是谁的情况使用，比如the law was regulated to do sth；
如果知道的话，比如这道题目是the council，就应该用主动而不是被动

2.我记得idiom是grant sb sth吧，现在变成了sth is granted by sb了

3. 那个the right to do sth to sb在我看来是awkward的结构，因为有违结构的repetition的结构，我们学习句子喜欢用to xx toxxx，但是从SC遇到的很多题目发现他们都尽量避免出现这种to等的repetition.

摘一句曼哈顿的director就是参与编写我们那本曼哈顿SC书的RON的一句话：gmac does seem to make a fairly concerted effort to avoid repetitions such as “x that y that z”, “x to y to z”, etc.

所以会把遇到的结构：evidence that suggests that…，改成：evidence to suggest that…

还有一道的正确答案是：minority graduates are nearly four times as likely as other graduates to plan on practicing，本来应该是plan to do sth的，但是就因为前面是four times as likely as .... to do sth，已经有个to do了，所以避免后面再出现个plan to do 的repetition,所以正确答案出现的是plan on.

我记得还有一道In no other historical sighting did Halley's comet cause such a worldwide sensation as in its return of 1910–1911

正常我们都应该是in 1910用介词in，但是就因为前面的比较点一定要出现in的in its return,所以后面吧in改成了of。这就是老美的written english的表达方法

当然也有出现过exception，我也遇到过，但是基本都是这个理。所以这道题有更好的一个选项，比如第一句，第二句就直接排了吧

12604698 · 发表于 2012-1-30 16:54:43

12604698 · 发表于 2012-1-30 17:00:31

The council granted the right to make legal petition to city official.

What does the phrase "to city official" mean? Did the city officials receive the right to make legal petitions? Or did someone else receive the right to make petitions to the officials? Eithe way, the correct sentence should resolve the ambiguity:

歧义1：council 保证city official 做出合法申诉的权力
The council granted city officials the right to make legal petitions. ；；；；
歧义2：council保证（someone）对city offcials 合法申诉的权力
The right to make legal petitions to city officials was granted by the council.

grant the right 和 petieon后面都能接to sb
由于to sb可以跳跃修饰， to city official 究竟接谁不清楚了。

原句只想说明这个意思。。。。

justabeginning · 发表于 2012-1-30 17:00:52

清飞扬同学分析的很好
另外说一些题外话...饭饭要在做SC时注意一点：所有句子都会有歧义
例如：i don't like the weather in Hongkong. 这句话有我和香港的气候不相像的歧义
再例如：tell my father i am very busy right now. 这句话有我是现在是‘very busy ’（或者我现在的名字叫very busy）的歧义
（你可以尝试用这种方式去看一些SC的正确句子）
我想说的是SC中所有的的句子都会有歧义，包括正确的选项，所以你在做题的过程中要留意歧义‘歧’得最离谱的，这样才不会去钻牛角尖
同样在代词指代，分词修饰中很多正确的选项都会有些不合适的地方，过多的关注这些不合适同样会钻牛角尖
一定要注意，SC选的是错的最少的

泾渭不凡 · 发表于 2012-1-30 19:49:04

一看到第二句结构就是错的，直接排掉
1. 有违主动的原则，能够用主动的竟然用了被动。不是说被动不可以，但是被动的表达通常是在不知行为操作的agent是谁的情况使用，比如the law was regulated to do sth；
如果知道的话，比如这道题目是the council，就应该用主动而不是被动

2.我记得idiom是grant sb sth吧，现在变成了sth is granted by sb了

3. 那个the right to do sth to sb在我看来是awkward的结构，因为有违结构的repetition的结构，我们学习句子喜欢用to xx toxxx，但是从SC遇到的很多题目发现他们都尽量避免出现这种to等的repetition.

摘一句曼哈顿的director就是参与编写我们那本曼哈顿SC书的RON的一句话：gmac does seem to make a fairly concerted effort to avoid repetitions such as “x that y that z”, “x to y to z”, etc.

所以会把遇到的结构：evidence that suggests that…，改成：evidence to suggest that…

还有一道的正确答案是：minority graduates are nearly four times as likely as other graduates to plan on practicing，本来应该是plan to do sth的，但是就因为前面是four times as likely as .... to do sth，已经有个to do了，所以避免后面再出现个plan to do 的repetition,所以正确答案出现的是plan on.

我记得还有一道In no other historical sighting did Halley's comet cause such a worldwide sensation as in its return of 1910–1911

正常我们都应该是in 1910用介词in，但是就因为前面的比较点一定要出现in的in its return,所以后面吧in改成了of。这就是老美的written english的表达方法

当然也有出现过exception，我也遇到过，但是基本都是这个理。所以这道题有更好的一个选项，比如第一句，第二句就直接排了吧

-- by 会员清飞扬 (2012/1/30 15:54:28)

O(∩_∩)O~谢谢清飞扬！清飞扬语法学得好透彻啊，饭饭这段就是从manhattanSC中摘录出来的，真心觉得第二句没有解决原句的问题，反而使其变成被动，以为是有什么特殊用法~~~
清飞扬的这次解析饭饭真心受教好多啊~~！谢谢！！这个repetition，饭饭以前真心没有研究啊~！谢谢！！！

泾渭不凡 · 发表于 2012-1-30 19:50:37

-- by 会员 12604698 (2012/1/30 16:54:43)

= =！

泾渭不凡 · 发表于 2012-1-30 19:53:27

清飞扬同学分析的很好
另外说一些题外话...饭饭要在做SC时注意一点：所有句子都会有歧义
例如：i don't like the weather in Hongkong. 这句话有我和香港的气候不相像的歧义
再例如：tell my father i am very busy right now. 这句话有我是现在是‘very busy ’（或者我现在的名字叫very busy）的歧义
（你可以尝试用这种方式去看一些SC的正确句子）
我想说的是SC中所有的的句子都会有歧义，包括正确的选项，所以你在做题的过程中要留意歧义‘歧’得最离谱的，这样才不会去钻牛角尖
同样在代词指代，分词修饰中很多正确的选项都会有些不合适的地方，过多的关注这些不合适同样会钻牛角尖
一定要注意，SC选的是错的最少的

-- by 会员 justabeginning (2012/1/30 17:00:52)

O(∩_∩)O哈哈~路飞~！！饭饭这题真心是有点钻牛角尖了~~一共放了3个地方~~
饭饭听路飞的话~还是回归排除法~！

泾渭不凡 · 发表于 2012-1-30 22:36:57

The council granted the right to make legal petition to city official.

What does the phrase "to city official" mean? Did the city officials receive the right to make legal petitions? Or did someone else receive the right to make petitions to the officials? Eithe way, the correct sentence should resolve the ambiguity:

歧义1：council 保证city official 做出合法申诉的权力
The council granted city officials the right to make legal petitions. ；；；；
歧义2：council保证（someone）对city offcials 合法申诉的权力
The right to make legal petitions to city officials was granted by the council.

right 和 petieon后面都能接to sb
由于to sb可以跳跃修饰， to city official 究竟接谁不清楚了。

原句只想说明这个意思。。。。

-- by 会员 12604698 (2012/1/30 17:00:31)

T-T...........刚刚真心脑残捏~~~谢谢~~~~！！！明白袅~~~~~~~

~~~~终于明白袅~~~

此贴为“饭饭脑残贴~”........................T-T....................

michaelmay17 · 发表于 2012-1-30 22:52:10

留名

饭饭求一个句子分析~~O(∩_∩)O~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()