Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 ayear toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
A.year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B.year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
C.year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D.year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
E.year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education 这道题目为什么B不对?牛人解释,没觉得错啊。。。
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 ayear toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
A.year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B.year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
C.year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D.year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
E.year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education 这道题目为什么B不对?牛人解释,没觉得错啊。。。
-- by 会员 zlljolie (2011/7/15 21:08:13)
答案是A么? B是明显不行的,如果which是做从句主语,就没有for了,或者说,有for的情况下,要补个先行词 for which一般是which做状语的一部分
"previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.
B) this time the phrase isn't even clear - "for which was previously paid" makes no sense
C) "previously" is an adverb and should refer to a verb, but $7 is a noun - you'd need the adjective "previous" here. And really you'd want to say something like "compared to the previous requirement of $7 per year"
D) I'm not a huge fan of this source. I assume the reason to eliminate this one is non-specification that the $7 per year required previously was specifically required for higher education. But I don't think the real test would make this the only distinction. They might also try to claim something's wrong with "instead of" (rather than "as opposed to" in answer E), but instead of can properly refer to a noun, as it does here... so it's fine.
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 ayear toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
A.year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B.year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
C.year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D.year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
E.year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education 这道题目为什么B不对?牛人解释,没觉得错啊。。。
-- by 会员 zlljolie (2011/7/15 21:08:13)
选D
A 分词短语被逗号隔开放在句尾,做伴随状语。句子结构是:students boycotted classes...to protest a law that...a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
先看原句,paying做伴随状语伴随主句动作,明显是错的。
B for which介词加which形式,教你一个判断介词加which是否正确的捷径:把which所指代的对象恢复成一个陈述句,the cost of higher education was previously paid 7 USD per year. 不需要加介词对么? 再举个例子: 找一个需要加介词的句子:this is the house which i was born in this is the house in which i was born this is the reason which he did so much things for this is the reason for which he did so much things.